On 27 Nov 2010, at 19:58, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
much of the BBC's online production has been released in flash (JAM) and
other proprietary mediums.
IE9 will implement SVG along with Mozilla, Safari-Webkit, Google-Chrome,
Opera and other standards-compliant web browsers.
Given the
On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:07, Stephen Jolly wrote:
I don't have any inside information on the subject, but I suspect the BBC
would be most likely to move away from flash either (a) if it would save
money, or (b) to increase reach on devices that don't support it. Aside from
the general
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:17, Ben Weiner b...@readingtype.org.uk wrote:
Bearing in mind your opening remark, does licensing attributable to Flash
cost a lot [of the licence-payers' money]?
it's a cost/benefit thing, though.
if, e.g., CBeebies games were reworked as SVG, then it'd cut off a
two-fold
1. There is currently a notion to release government data, and the
BBC has already included itself in this process by for instance
releasing salaries of certain key executives.
2. as already mentioned recent releases of all popular browsers now
display SVG.
As it will take
Hi
On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:33, Mo McRoberts wrote:
(and that's even assuming SVG is the right tool for the job anyway; I
suspect canvas + JS will probably end up seeing more use over SVG
for a lot of stuff...)
Another vector for this argument? [think I agree though]
Ben
--
Ben Weiner |
Thought the BBC's browser support guidelines may help here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/technical/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/technical/browser_support.sh
tml
http://www.bbc.co.uk/guidelines/futuremedia/technical/multimedia_plugins
_flash.shtml
As a website funded
On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:55, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
As a website funded by the licence fee, it's more important to us that
as many people have access to the content than necessarily being at the
bleeding edge of technology. IE6 and 7 are both in our Level 1 browser
support categorisation
David,
did you read the rest of the sentence?
you didn't quote it and it is highly relevant.
~:
On 29 Nov 2010, at 12:01, David Dorward wrote:
On 29 Nov 2010, at 11:55, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
As a website funded by the licence fee, it's more important to us
that
as many people have
Apple devices, both mobile and desktop, still occupy a minority across the
deployed userbase (just a disporportionately large mindshare, the Reality
Distortion Effect hard at work as always). Android MS still have lion's
share of mobile devices worldwide and they're going to be locked in a battle
Christopher,
excellent points, the real crux you circle but failed (to) state is
the lack of excellent authoring tools.
the one that brings tears to my eyes is animation without a timeline.
it must be de facto that one starts with onion-skinning, a score and
timeline, but
the
the one that brings tears to my eyes is animation without a timeline.
it must be de facto that one starts with onion-skinning, a
score and timeline, but
I'm not sure that a timeline-less format would be best. I can get my head
round a timeline based animation format quite easily (and
11 matches
Mail list logo
