On Nov 5, 2007 8:03 AM, Spiros Denaxas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is. tiny.bbc.co.uk/2m2kLAp
Avoiding obfuscation (and sub-domain complexity);
www.bbc.co.uk/go/ashley_highfield_nov07_interview
P
Spiros
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit
I see the benefit of capitalisation there, lest it be misread as
http://www.GigantiCurl.com/ Discovering that, ahem, Number 2
interpretation was wrong was a big relief.
I'll get my coat...
On Nov 5, 2007 10:10 AM, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's not forget:
On Nov 5, 2007 10:26 PM, Matthew Somerville
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Greaves wrote:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Martin Deutsch wrote:
But if you're talking well-designed URLs for journey planning, see:
http://www.traintimes.org.uk/cardiff/birmingham/8:00
Thank you for that site pointer.
On 6/26/07, Ian Betteridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/06/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The BBC should be, in my humble opinion, about creating content for the
use of licence fee payers. As long as no payment is received, licence fee
payers should be able to watch,
On 10/31/06, James Boardwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
playing on the whole theatrical metaphor:
...command line not chorus line
enter backstage alt *left*
... an open deleteair/delete source production
Not to be a party-pooper but one thing that characterised my initial
impression of
On 11/1/06, Nic James Ferrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think there is certainly something very different about the
backstage development community compared to other developer
networks. Not a lot of code does get shared, yes I agree. But I
don't
Let's try this again from a subscribed address... (apols if this comes
through twice.)
On 10/5/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Found via Slashdot,
http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search
It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not happy
that
7 matches
Mail list logo
