ckst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
[mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 26 January 2010 09:35
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mail archives
IMHO Majordomo is the IE6 of discussion software. Or perhaps it sh
IMHO Majordomo is the IE6 of discussion software. Or perhaps it should be
the MS-DOS 3.3?
2010/1/26 Stephen Jolly
>
> On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:27, Mo McRoberts wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:43, Ian Forrester
> wrote:
> >> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe
On 25 Jan 2010, at 14:27, Mo McRoberts wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:43, Ian Forrester wrote:
>> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
>> whole thing to Mailman?
>
> There was a consensus for Mailman, although I don't think anybody
> hates Majordomo e
I'll submit to gmane, which means I can start accessing the list via NNTP
(hurrah) - I guess others should feel free to submit to other places if they
think it's worthwhile?
---
Sure as long as there's not too much cross posting. Backstage should stay on
topic :)
More low-level exposure for bac
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:43, Ian Forrester wrote:
> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
> whole thing to Mailman?
There was a consensus for Mailman, although I don't think anybody
hates Majordomo enough to stamp feet over it!
> Because the list is publi
ckst...@lists.bbc.co.uk]
On Behalf Of Dan Brickley
Sent: 25 January 2010 13:09
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Mail archives
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ian Forrester wrote:
> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
> whol
ckst...@lists.bbc.co.uk [mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk]
On Behalf Of Michael Smethurst
Sent: 25 January 2010 13:30
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Mail archives
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ian Forrester
> wrote:
>> I agree but there was no clear idea what we
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ian Forrester
> wrote:
>> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
>> whole thing to Mailman?
>>
>> Because the list is public, I guess there is nothing stopping it being
>> archived in multiple places if you know anywhere be
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ian Forrester wrote:
> I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
> whole thing to Mailman?
>
> Because the list is public, I guess there is nothing stopping it being
> archived in multiple places if you know anywhere better?
>
>
Mo McRoberts wrote:
Hi all,
I know things are due to change on this list at *some* point (presumably
post-move!), but this has been bugging me for a while :)
I might be the only one, but I find mail-archive.com to be… suboptimal, it's
quite often incredibly slow (sometimes to the point of bei
I agree but there was no clear idea what we should do except maybe move the
whole thing to Mailman?
Because the list is public, I guess there is nothing stopping it being archived
in multiple places if you know anywhere better?
Secret[] Private[x] Public[]
Ian Forrester
Senior Backstage Prod
11 matches
Mail list logo
