Jason,
[Apologies if this appears twice. I doubt it will though, because I
originally used the wrong 'from' address.]
I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this
flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably
shows a shift to client-side code.
Jason,
[Apologies if this is duplicated, but GMail is not indicating clearly
whether this is making it to the list or not. :( ]
I disagree. "Web 2.0", and whatever people's interpretations of this
flimsy collection of technologies and concepts is, in my view invariably
shows a shift to client-s
Jason,
which web2.0 apis are you proposing that produce accessible or even
validating code?
cheers
Jonathan Chetwynd
On 1 Nov 2006, at 16:29, Jason Cartwright wrote:
the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single
successful web authoring application that's publishe
> the fact is that after ten years or more there's still not a single
successful web authoring application that's publishes accessible
validated code
I'm not sure that this is fault of the application - all your major
desktop apps, as well as most (mainly open source) CMSes will happily
produce ve
4 matches
Mail list logo