At 18:55 +0100 13/6/07, Andy wrote:
On 13/06/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole point of home server is that you connect to it like a
appliance over a
http connection. So it should run with no display.
I would personally go for SSH. It's designed for remote admining, http
I've both accepted and done it for quite a few years now. Just makes sense.
An old Xbox with XBMC on it makes a cracking media centre machine, and hell,
I had so many computer bits lying around I just bunged together an old
server and slapped WS2003 on it (OS provided gratis by my Uni!) I know
layout of the 2000/XP design.
Old dog, new tricks and all that.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2007 15:29
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Windows Home Server RC1 available for
download
WHS is built ontop of Windows
On 13/06/07, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The whole point of home server is that you connect to it like a appliance over a
http connection. So it should run with no display.
I would personally go for SSH. It's designed for remote admining, http isn't.
Though a HTTP interface would be
For sure Ian,
We already have our own network broadcasting/server units at
home :--) Have had for three years or more.
In my case.
Mac G5 plus 30 inch screen as desktop, with a 23 inch as a TV or
second screen. add bittorrent, or DVD, or iTunes plus iChat..
with a terrabyte of
5 matches
Mail list logo
