I have an E172 which worked with a Mac (powerpc) and now works with Linplus.
The vodafone fora are much more helpful in that respect.
http://forum.vodafone.co.uk/index.php?showforum=53
I hope that is of help.
2009/1/25 zen16...@zen.co.uk
Totally OT and self indulgent (APOLOGIES), but wondered
Muchas gracias, amigo
From: owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk
[mailto:owner-backst...@lists.bbc.co.uk] On Behalf Of jugjogee
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 1:52 PM
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] OT - Mobile Broadband
I have an E172 which worked with a Mac
A lot to enjoy here...
Our plans for the level of service which we believe should be universal. We
anticipate this consideration will include options up to 2Mb/s.
http://www.dcms.gov.uk/images/publications/digital_britain_interimreportjan09.pdf
Brian Butterworth
follow me on twitter:
I love how they make it sound like Apple's recent dumping of DRM was an
embrace of some form of DRM that would work on any and all devices:
Digital Rights Management (DRM), properly applied, also has a role (i.e.
where it allows users to access content on any device that they own, rather
than
And plenty not to:
(page 22)
On the same basis, the Government has yet to see a case for
legislation in favour of
net neutrality. In consequence, unless Ofcom find network operators or
ISPs to have
Significant Market Power and justify intervention on competition
grounds, traffic
I'm quite impressed by the way that the whole DAB+ issue has become a box
about the boring sounding European 'Digital Radio Receivers Profiles' on
page 33. Strange way to write a long-term plan if you ask me.
2009/1/29 Jim Tonge jim_d_to...@yahoo.co.uk
And plenty not to:
(page 22)
On the
In the box on page 34, the second table has no headings. Nowhere does it
mention the 'planned coverage' is for 2030. And best of all...
N.B. Comparing analogue FM to DAB coverage is not straightforward due to
the individual characteristics of each platform and it is necessary to
measure the
Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see any mention of FM vs DAB quality. Even
if the coverage is (eventually) there, if the quality isn't as good then I
don't see 50% of the population switching to DAB any time soon.
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 16:31, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tvwrote:
In
The recommendation isn't 50% dab, it's 50% digital listening - so
combination of DAB, IP, DTV etc. i.e. choose the one that matches your
expectations of quality.
on the DAB+ point, the boring sounding profiles bit means that there is
a set of profiles that mean that a digital broadcast radio can
But if it's 50% digital listening and let's say 90% of that isn't DAB, then
why bother making a clear statement of Government and policy commitment to
enabling DAB to be a primary distribution network for radio;?
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 18:05, John Ousby john.ou...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
The
2009/1/29 John Ousby john.ou...@bbc.co.uk
The recommendation isn't 50% dab, it's 50% digital listening - so
combination of DAB, IP, DTV etc. i.e. choose the one that matches your
expectations of quality.
on the DAB+ point, the boring sounding profiles bit means that there is a
set of
Good to hear even more BBC buildings are being used to host Community events.
We're had a few in the Manchester offices already
Ian Forrester
This e-mail is: [x] private; [] ask first; [] bloggable
Senior Producer, BBC Backstage
Room 1044, BBC Manchester BH, Oxford Road, M60 1SJ
email:
I guess they believe that in the timeframe they are talking about,
broadcast delivery is still the most scalable and achievable way of
delivering large amounts of content to mass audiences simultaneously
across a range of situations of use. This doesn't deny the significance
of IP delivery, or the
13 matches
Mail list logo
