[backstage] Native to a Web of Accessible Data?

Native to a Web of Data thanks for that Peter, and Kim for pointing it up! what fun, with some clarity, but... Does Tom fail to mention accessibility? or was it just me. cheers ~: Jonathan Chetwynd with 254 validation errors on the homepage, yahoo.com may have a way to go. - Sent

[backstage] Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 08:54:59 +0100

Hi Kim,I have been quietly watching this list for some time, but your excellent request has made me switch to 'output mode'I am sure others will be able to express this better, but it seems to me that there is an opportunity to put some structure in place to enable and encourage evolution of

Re: [backstage] Web2.0 - tennets, rules, development philosophy...I'd love you to give us some feedback

Title: Re: [backstage] Web2.0 - tennets, rules, development philosophy...I'd love you to give us some feedback Hi all, This is my first post to the list but I have enjoyed this thread so wanted to contribute. Im an ASP.NET developer and Im heavily involved with the Microsoft Development

[backstage] Native to an Accessible Web of Data?

Native to an Accessible Web of Data? does this subject capture the issue better? I can spend days wondering about the minutiae of intended meanings, so usually post and think later ~: thanks for that Peter, and Kim for pointing it up! what fun, with some clarity, but... Does Tom fail to

Re: [backstage] Native to a Web of Accessible Data?

Sort of yes, and sort of no. So: accessibility is in part a front-end issue. Tom's talking about the layer of abstraction beyond that - the general architectural level - and, by and large, he *is* promoting accessibility - accessibility to data. Accessibility is about more than blind

Re: [backstage] Web2.0 - tennets, rules, development philosophy... I'd love you to give us some feedback

On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, Matthew Somerville wrote: [...] Amazon launched their web services in 2002, and I remember mash-ups being created back then - e.g. Amazon Light. I was mashing up Gopher interfaces mining into our text based BLS OPAC at the University back in 92/93. Is that too old skool?