From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James Cridland
Sent: 28 January 2007 22:27
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] DRM
On 1/26/07, Andrew Bowden [EMAIL
No thanks for the email,
I've passed it on to the weather team
Cheers,
Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || cubicgarden.com || geekdinner.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Iain McWilliams
Sent: 29 January 2007 08:15
To:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew
Somerville
Sent: 29 January 2007 01:14
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] £1.2 billion question (or RE:
[backstage] BBC Bias??? Click and Torrents)
Brian Butterworth
On 1/29/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not a case of what I think about the law, it is my
understanding of it.
There is no legal precedent to support your position.
Yours neither. :-)
Well there is two precedents. Firstly the BBC took BSB to the high court to
stop
(snip)
The second is the withdrawal of the BBC and ITV (and soon
C4 and Five)
from using BSkyB's encryption service on satellite, because the EU
Television Without Frontiers directive allows them not to.
This is related to territorial rights granted by those that
hold the
All tru
Brainz has advanced relationships to break Paul Simon and Art
Garfunkel into paul Simon and Art Garfunkel (bad example I know)
And for that matter Peter Andre and Jordan into Peter Andre and
Jordan
[http://tinyurl.com/2yxx76]
This link is to Amazon.co.uk which reminded
On 29/01/07, James Cridland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In most cases, the broadcaster has negotiated limited
The distributor's limited rights have been extended in the opposite
direction to where distribution technology has taken us.
rights in a limited time-frame and a limited territory to
At 14:49 + 27/1/07, Brian Butterworth wrote:
I'm horrified (again) to see Auntie misrepresenting technologies on Click
The BBC's flagship technology programme
Both the programme and web page call the sharing of TV programmes using
BitTorrent systems 'illegal'.
More Joost invites anyone?
I have a few more invites if anyone is interested?
Drop me a personal email
Ian
Tom Loosemore wrote:
On 28/01/07, Libby Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Robert Kerry wrote:
Email me if you'd like an invite - not sure how many I can give out
(snip)
What do you mean by DOMESTIC sharing exactly?
Timeshifting (e.g. family sits down to catch on a programme record
previously) is different from re-distribution (i.e. sharing).
The law says The making in domestic premises for private and domestic use
of a recording of a
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Brian Butterworth wrote:
Sorry if you didn't get why this is a backstage issue, let me
explain more carefully.
I didn't say any such thing, someone else in the thread did.
I don't recall say that YOU did.
You were replying to my email, and you wrote you, as
Thanks for that Libby, much appreciated.
Off to play with my new toys now ;-)
Cheers - Neil
At 12:17 28/01/2007, you wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Robert Kerry wrote:
Email me if you'd like an invite - not sure how many I can give out though.
:o)
(belatedly) I work for Joost and have a
12 matches
Mail list logo
