Hi, still have one?
If so, let me try it.
--
Akira HIROSE
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Brian Butterworth
wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I have some Google Wave invites left .. please let me know if you would like
> one.
> --
>
> Brian Butterworth
>
> follow me on twitter: http://twitter.com/briantist
2009/12/2 Stephen Jolly :
>
>
> I'm also not convinced [of] the performance issues with the Wave beta
I expect this to work like multiplayer deathmatch game server services.
--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.
On 2 Dec 2009, at 13:15, Ian Forrester wrote:
> So during the rest of the discussion and reading this -
> http://orchard.co.uk/Blog/Google-Wave-much-maligned-but-missunderstood-128.aspx,
> I'm wondered if Google had putout wave too early for consumers?
I can't say I agree with Andy Chesters - G
2009/12/2 Ian Forrester :
>
>
> seeing isn't wave at all. Its simply a rough cut
> implementation of what's possible with the wave protocol.
Right; the protocol seems sound enough, and I expect that (like
Novell) it will get picked up by projects that would have had to have
done the engineering on
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 13:15, Ian Forrester wrote:
>
> So during the rest of the discussion and reading this -
> http://orchard.co.uk/Blog/Google-Wave-much-maligned-but-missunderstood-128.aspx,
> I'm wondered if Google had put out wave too early for consumers?
>
>
>From the post
"Had Google have
Hi All,
I was at Social Media Café Manchester yesterday and there was a session about
Wave. I and Paul Robertson stated the fact that the "wave" people are there
seeing isn't wave at all. Its simply a rough cut implementation of what's
possible with the wave protocol.
http://search.twitter.com
6 matches
Mail list logo
