Re: [backstage] HDCP RIP
More on this story: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20016756-245.html On 15 September 2010 08:30, Mo McRoberts m...@nevali.net wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:38, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote: On 14 September 2010 17:12, Ant Miller ant.mil...@gmail.com wrote: For all it's flaws I think there was a decent model at the heart of it. It did describe a model of media use that made sense, that described the reasonable expectations of use of the ordinary user, and the ... oh, no wait, I'm thinking of something else. At least the BBC didn't waste any time and money on HDCP being selectively enabled on Freeview HD devices. Oh wait, I'm thinking of something else too. You're forgetting Freesat. M. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
Re: [backstage] HDCP RIP
*hysterical laughter* - Original message - More on this story: http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-20016756-245.html On 15 September 2010 08:30, Mo McRoberts m...@nevali.net wrote: On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:38, Brian Butterworth briant...@freeview.tv wrote: On 14 September 2010 17:12, Ant Miller ant.mil...@gmail.com wrote: For all it's flaws I think there was a decent model at the heart of it. It did describe a model of media use that made sense, that described the reasonable expectations of use of the ordinary user, and the ... oh, no wait, I'm thinking of something else. At least the BBC didn't waste any time and money on HDCP being selectively enabled on Freeview HD devices. Oh wait, I'm thinking of something else too. You're forgetting Freesat. M. - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
