Um, it's not weview, it's YouView, (though no, I'm no fan of the name or
the branding)
derp. My brain has no excuse for why it did that. I know I thought this
originally before my brain decided to replace half the name (perhaps in
protest? ;-) but YouView's even worse! Rubbish take off
Yeah, and I *love* the way that the jv is kicking the foss community in the
teeth over tc...
The least they could do is give something back! Actually, correct me if I'm
wrong, but haven't they got to make the source code available?
I've already been on the phone to them about possibly
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 13:49, Ant Miller ant.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
Um, it's not weview, it's YouView, (though no, I'm no fan of the name or the
branding) and copyright for content of a website is usually vested in the
website owner- I'd doubt you'd find much different on most commercial
Um, it's not weview, it's YouView, (though no, I'm no fan of the name or the
branding) and copyright for content of a website is usually vested in the
website owner- I'd doubt you'd find much different on most commercial
company web sites, and YouView is a commercial joint venture (albeit with a
Ah, I stand corrected (or clarrified)- the JV is Not For Profit. Not a
charrity though. And they will have paid someone to make content for their
website so (for instance) we needn't expect images of DR Who used to be
considered fully rights free.
a
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Ant Miller
It's more the you will not attempt to reverse-engineer, decompile... Etc etc
bit.
When the guts are all FOSS
- Original message -
Yeah, and I *love* the way that the jv is kicking the foss community in
the teeth over tc...
The least they could do is give something
On 20 Sep 2010, at 14:37, Alex Cockell wrote:
It's more the you will not attempt to reverse-engineer, decompile... Etc
etc bit.
Link?
S
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
http://www.youview.com/terms-and-conditions/
Clauses 3.2.2, clause 5 (esp where the code is open source), clause 10.
Basically it would appear that the jv are trying to close what was previously
open.
Also, I don't like the bit in the tech docs about updates failing silently.
- Original
On 20 Sep 2010, at 15:45, Alex Cockell wrote:
http://www.youview.com/terms-and-conditions/
Clauses 3.2.2, clause 5 (esp where the code is open source), clause 10.
Basically it would appear that the jv are trying to close what was previously
open.
IANAL and I don't work for Youview,
September 2010 15:45
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] 'Project Canvas' to be called
'YouView':
http://www.youview.com/terms-and-conditions/
Clauses 3.2.2, clause 5 (esp where the code is open source),
clause 10
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 15:45, Alex Cockell a...@acockell.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
http://www.youview.com/terms-and-conditions/
Clauses 3.2.2, clause 5 (esp where the code is open source), clause 10.
Basically it would appear that the jv are trying to close what was
previously open.
Also worth
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 15:45, Andrew Bowden andrew.bow...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
Ahem. I think it's worth reading clause 1.1... These are terms for using
the website and for content provided on You View. There's no claiming of
copyright ownership over open source software.
[snip]
If you use
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 16:09, Andrew Bowden andrew.bow...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
People have been saying that for years.
My favourite are the terms that say you have to have a licence to link to
their site.
Amongst my pet hates are the sites which cheerfully note that you
don't need a licence to
Agreed.
So do you think it'll just be a case of 'watch this space' re licences in the
final spec? Annoys the hell out of me that the Beeb seem to have forgotten
about the enthusiasts with this obsession with locking everything down.
Just changing tack for a sec... An open maint list for
http://informitv.com/news/2010/09/16/youviewisconfirmed/
Personally, I think 'WeView' would have been a better follow-on
from 'iPlayer' and 'YouTube'. But that might suggest open
collaboration and public participation, so perhaps not. :-/
--
Frank Wales [fr...@limov.com]
-
Sent via the
Yeah, and I *love* the way that the jv is kicking the foss community in the
teeth over tc...
Who fucking WROTE gstreamer, the kernel and 95 percent of the code in the
platform? The least they could do is give something back! Actually, correct me
if I'm wrong, but haven't they got to make the
16 matches
Mail list logo