RE: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-08 Thread Gordon Joly
At 16:33 +0100 5/10/06, Daniel Morris wrote: Found via Slashdot, http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not happy that XSL didn't make the list of languages. Looks similar to http://koders.com Here is

Re: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-08 Thread Gordon Joly
XSL is different from the other XML variants in that XSL is a programming language whereas the other XML/SGML applications are only document formats. If you want to get technical, XSL is Turing complete; the others aren't. I see.

[backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Ian Forrester
Found via Slashdot, http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not happy that XSL didn't make the list of languages. Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To

RE: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Daniel Morris
Found via Slashdot, http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not happy that XSL didn't make the list of languages. Looks similar to http://koders.com Daniel Morris | Web Developer BBC Entertainment :

Re: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Jonathan Chetwynd
well, XML, HTML, RDF, SVG and more don't so xsl is in great company... cheers Jonathan Chetwynd On 5 Oct 2006, at 16:14, Ian Forrester wrote: Found via Slashdot, http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not

RE: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Luke Dicken
Aren't they all different grammars of SGML anyhow? If we're being pedantic... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd Sent: 05 October 2006 16:46 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] Google code search well

RE: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Ian Forrester
Good point! Will have to email Google about this now :) Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jonathan Chetwynd Sent: 05 October 2006 16:46 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] Google code

RE: [backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Ian Forrester
Maybe its best to not even go there :) Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke Dicken Sent: 05 October 2006 17:04 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] Google code search Aren't they all

[backstage] Google code search

2006-10-05 Thread Paul Makepeace
Let's try this again from a subscribed address... (apols if this comes through twice.) On 10/5/06, Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Found via Slashdot, http://www.google.com/codesearch/advanced_code_search It certainly looks useful, specially the licence selector but I'm not happy that