There is provision in the system to allow software updates to
particular models so it should in theory be possible to
release an EPG update to the newer boxes only. I can however
imagine that this would become a real headache to keep track
of as there are quite a few different box
On 10/10/2007, Richard Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07 19:24, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it could be done on analogue - you could never see the join in the
switch to regional programmes on the BBC even back as far as Sixty
Minutes, so it MUST be
On 09/10/2007, Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://radar.oreilly.com/Picture%2052.html
Full story - http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/throng_unveils.html
I saw this while browsing my rss aggregator. Seems like a decent design
for a TV Guide. I was wondering how it would
On 09/10/2007, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/9/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see a broadcaster wanting this kind of EPG on their system, as
it removes the channel identities.
As a viewer, do you really need to know which channel a programme is on
Mr I Forrester wrote:
http://radar.oreilly.com/Picture%2052.html
Full story - http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/throng_unveils.html
I saw this while browsing my rss aggregator. Seems like a decent design
for a TV Guide. I was wondering how it would work if placed on one of
those
On 09/10/2007, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIUI, a large part of Sky's capacity problem is to do with their
receivers still being built to more or less the same spec as when they
launched in 1998. There are many things in them which could be done
better, but Sky are obviously keen to
On 10/10/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you use the word compressed do you mean lossless data compression of
the EPG data, or lossy MPEG-2 compression of the videostreams?
That's not the only type of compression in existence. Theoretically if
I want to transmit 3 streams
On 10/10/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2007, Duncan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 09/10/2007, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AIUI, a large part of Sky's capacity problem is to do with their
receivers still being built to more or less the same
I fear we're veering rapidly off topic here, but...
On 10/10/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2007, Duncan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately nobody as yet has come up with
a way of doing a seamless (ie no macro blocking/breaks in
transmission) switch
On 10/10/2007, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switching between SDI signals is easy; what Duncan's suggesting is a bit
trickier.
At present: the BBC and ITV, and Channel 4 have satellite multiplexes which
carry several channels which are the same for most of the day; they can
differ
On 10/10/2007, Duncan Barnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/2007, Martin Deutsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Switching between SDI signals is easy; what Duncan's suggesting is a bit
trickier.
At present: the BBC and ITV, and Channel 4 have satellite multiplexes
which
carry several
On 10/10/07 19:24, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it could be done on analogue - you could never see the join in the switch
to regional programmes on the BBC even back as far as Sixty Minutes, so it
MUST be possible.
On analogue Satellite? I don¹t think so. After all, the
Interesting. It's a bit like this...
http://www.marumushi.com/apps/newsmap/newsmap.cfm?layout=0selected=ukcategories=world,nation,business,technology,sports,entertainment,health
I can't see a broadcaster wanting this kind of EPG on their system, as it
removes the channel identities.
Perhaps it
On 10/9/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't see a broadcaster wanting this kind of EPG on their system, as it
removes the channel identities.
As a viewer, do you really need to know which channel a programme is on
before you decide to watch it? I suppose there are a few
14 matches
Mail list logo
