The purpose of being good enough to satisfy the people that own the rights to the content - and therefore being able to release the content in this manner.
J -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Crossland Sent: 08 February 2007 16:18 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] RE: [backstage] RE: [backstage] RE: [backstage] £1.2 billion question (or RE: [backstage] BBC Bias??? >Click and Torrents) On 06/02/07, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 06/02/07, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And yet it's still used... > > > Doesn't that say something? > > It says that record execs are stupid, but we all knew that already. > > I was going more for a "it might be broken by some, but it's good > enough for 'purpose'". And what is that purpose, exactely? -- Regards, Dave - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/ - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk/
