Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-29 Thread Gordon Joly
At 19:45 + 21/12/06, Richard P Edwards wrote: DRM. well look at a system that is already successfully used. A CD has a unique code at the front ... ISRC if you want to even have a chance of being paid a royalty then this code has to be preserved. In my mind, it must be possible to

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-22 Thread Mark Hewis
PVR's and Sky's on-demand player can only push that subscription % higher -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bowden Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:50 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread Jason Cartwright
Sure. One thing I'd like to do would be to: - take the BBC realvideo feeds (say newsnight) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/ (click the large Podcast button) - convert them into something sensible (mpeg?) MP4's? Here is the one from yesterday...

the various news feeds (was Re: [backstage] democracyplayer)

2006-12-21 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sure. One thing I'd like to do would be to: - take the BBC realvideo feeds (say newsnight) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/newsnight/ (click the large Podcast button) - convert them into something sensible (mpeg?) MP4's? Here is the one from

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread Gordon Joly
At 17:14 + 19/12/06, Frank my old mucker wrote: The Joly G-man wrote: The BBC are responsible in the main (AFAIK) for enforcing incorrect terminology as follows: 1) forward slash - a term used by Naomi Troski on the Big Byte, circa 1994. Since Ms Troski speaks fluent 'Strine, we assume

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread Richard P Edwards
What is great is that. One 3.5m satellite dish with a four way LNB, connected to four Sky boxes with four Sling Media Sling boxes attached to four Macs, because that is what I like, each with a couple of realtime Automator actions, stream the whole lot to Democracy from behind

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread oliver wood
Rich E makes a very compelling case! I imagine it is only a matter of time. Now that we have compression/encryption and bandwidth to do these things is is only time before an enterprising person gets on and does it. It would be a shame to have a reaction of squashing such as the music and film

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread Timothy-john Bishop
Okay, that sounds great, but what about rights management? I know its going to happen anyway but On 21/12/06, Richard P Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is great is that. One 3.5m satellite dish with a four way LNB, connected to four Sky boxes with four Sling Media Sling boxes

Re: buffy (was Re: [backstage] democracyplayer)

2006-12-21 Thread Timothy-john Bishop
Hang on... Commercial companies can produce utter trash (buffy I rest my case) but look at HBO producing Angels in America. Proper quality programming can be produced, you just need to keep the execs away from the bank manager. Tim Bishop City College Plymouth Students Union LGBT Officer

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-21 Thread Richard P Edwards
DRM. well look at a system that is already successfully used. A CD has a unique code at the front ... ISRC if you want to even have a chance of being paid a royalty then this code has to be preserved. In my mind, it must be possible to add a code within a data stream that uniquely

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Martin Belam
even wonder what the BBC is for in this digital era... ... ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:41 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer What you're talking

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Tom Loosemore
Maybe we should try and get more BBC managers here. How do you know there not watching this already? Seriously! Watching, maybe. But are they participating? Not so far as I've seen. i thoroughly resemble that remark - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe,

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Josh at GoUK.com
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 9:13 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer You're saying the global market is more important than everyone being able to download BBC content for free

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Richard Edwards
Hi Frank, Check mate for all of us, at the moment. Yes, I am sure that the BBC would prevail if they took such a case to court. at the same time, the potential for irreversible harm to the public persona of the Corporation would be rather large. I am certain that none of us has the right

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Andrew Bowden
In an era where we now have IP video delivery (and such delivery will increase in the future) then what is the point of the BBC? If Paul Jackson Productions can produce Red Dwarf IV I'm going to put my Dwarf hat on and quote the production of Red Dwarf. Series 1 (IIRC) was produced by BBC

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Andrew Bowden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Frankly, this is not a simple issue. It's nowhere near a simple issue. And it's getting more complicated by the day. When I hear of a simple issue I reach for my revolver. -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk for all your tapsell ferrier

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Jason Cartwright
at GoUK.com Sent: 20 December 2006 09:57 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer Thanks, Martin, for the explanation - appreciated and understood. In an era where we now have IP video delivery (and such delivery will increase in the future) then what is the point

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Richard Edwards
Congratulations to Azureus.. the first to get their foot in the door. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6194929.stm Anyone know how much they paid? Personally, I am a little sad. I would have thought that the BBC could have done this for themselves. Instead of using a DRM model from

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Ian Forrester
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Bowden Sent: 20 December 2006 10:07 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer Frankly, this is not a simple issue. It's nowhere near a simple issue. And it's getting

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Josh at GoUK.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Thanks, Martin, for the explanation - appreciated and understood. In an era where we now have IP video delivery (and such delivery will increase in the future) then what is the point of the BBC? If Paul Jackson Productions can produce Red Dwarf IV,

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Jason Cartwright
.financialstatements.pdf Page 11 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh at GoUK.com Sent: 19 December 2006 15:14 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer if the BBC started chucking out DRM free open format

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Josh at GoUK.com
: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 10:07 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer Just because the BBC is tasked with serving the British public, and just because it's generally moving in the direction of making content more freely available, it doesn't mean that each of us

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Richard Lockwood
The BBC could never have made Buffy the Vampire Slayer (the best TV *ever* in my opnion and yes, I can justify that). I rest my case. If Buffy is the best TV that can be made by commercial television companies, they need to be outlawed. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is the worst television show

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Martin Belam
don't get public money to support their online ventures. Festive wishes Josh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 9:13 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Luke Dicken
I am talking specifically asking for non-technical managers to be involved here. At least to some extent. I expect those people to think that they've already made up their minds. But they probably haven't really heard the wealth of different opnions there are on the subject. Its outside

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Josh at GoUK.com
But not everyone has the resources to publish and distribute - unless you consider YouTube to be an acceptable delivery system. Neither does every consumer have the ability to watch video delivered over the internet. You forget that not everyone is a geek - a common problem on this list of late.

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Andrew Bowden
Mmmm, think we're getting to an age where we need to reassess what tv quality programming is and what it means. We're not heading to a TV age, so the concept of TV programming will probably not be terribly relevant in a few years or so. The concept of TV programming may disappear because

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Josh at GoUK.com
Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank Wales Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 12:25 PM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer Josh at GoUK.com wrote: At one time, the BBC was needed as a distributor of content, but do we

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Josh at GoUK.com
- you can get 8m people around the TV for a shared experience watching Strictly Come Dancing and Doctor Who, but there are few (if any) videos on YouTube with an aggregation of 8 million eyeballs on them The shared experience thing is a red herring. 20 years ago, some shows would have got 15 or

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Luke Dicken [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Its outside the backstage remit for that kind of thing to be officially happening here though surely. I mean, I doubt there's anyone here who objects to this kind of discussion, sharing viewpoints and arguing is a good thing, but as someone has already

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Luke Dicken
How exactly is this discussion off-topic? Backstage.bbc.co.uk : Build what you want using BBC content backstage.bbc.co.uk is the BBC's developer network to encourage innovation and support new talent. Content feeds are available for people to build with on a non-commercial basis. Join the

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Tom Loosemore
On 20/12/06, Nic James Ferrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tom Loosemore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Maybe we should try and get more BBC managers here. How do you know there not watching this already? Seriously! Watching, maybe. But are they participating? Not so far as I've seen. i

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Ian Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nic what kind of stuff are talking about doing? Which Lawyers are you worried about? BBC or others? Can you give me an idea. Sure. One thing I'd like to do would be to: - take the BBC realvideo feeds (say newsnight) - convert them into something

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Frank Wales
Nic James Ferrier wrote: Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In the other, we're just a natural resource to be harvested and sold off like so many varieties of attentional baked-beans; any benefits we might get are a side-effect of the process. I realise you said it was very crude but I

buffy (was Re: [backstage] democracyplayer)

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I rest my case. If Buffy is the best TV that can be made by commercial television companies, they need to be outlawed. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is the worst television show I've *ever* seen. Then either you are not watching enough television or you

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Frank Wales [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *May* be more likely, but most don't, unless you class football or reality cop shows or 'Ironside' repeats as niche markets. Just as most commercial retailers *may* be more likely to serve niche markets, but most don't; MTV. the commercial imperative

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-20 Thread Kevin Anderson
Sent: 19 December 2006 15:14 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer if the BBC started chucking out DRM free open format versions of shows on the web, then it would have a massive impact on the global market - BBC Worldwide has just signed a deal with Zudeo [1

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Kim Plowright
Maybe we should try and get more BBC managers here. How do you know there not watching this already? Seriously! Define Managers? Because, well, if Tom L (in charge of plan for future of bbc.co.uk), Jem (in charge of strategy group for user generated content), Matt L (in charge of

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Martin Belam
What you're talking about is a global, industry issue with thousands of diverse stakeholders - from actors to cameramen. And you also have to realise that the rights are not just for the UK, there are different rights frameworks across the globe. So, for example, if the BBC started chucking

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Ian Forrester
or bbc podcasts, that might be a way forward? Ian Forrester || backstage.bbc.co.uk || x83965 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nic James Ferrier Sent: 18 December 2006 21:45 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Luke Dicken
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Lockwood Sent: 19 December 2006 11:41 To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer Hmm. My personal experience is that people (both ordinary users and technical users) don't use generally podcasts, and that generally, non

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Sean Dillon
Brendan Quinn wrote: The questions were actually [1] Do you ever use the internet to... Download a podcast so you can listen to it or view it at a later time? Did you happen to do this yesterday, or not? Which doesn't seem too misleading to me... Putting in the listen to it or view it at a

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Jason Cartwright
? I even wonder what the BBC is for in this digital era... ... ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Martin Belam Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 11:41 AM To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Subject: Re: [backstage] democracyplayer What you're

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Frank Wales
The Joly G-man wrote: The BBC are responsible in the main (AFAIK) for enforcing incorrect terminology as follows: 1) forward slash - a term used by Naomi Troski on the Big Byte, circa 1994. Since Ms Troski speaks fluent 'Strine, we assume that the term oblique stroke was not in her

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Neil Burton
] To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 3:13:59 PM Subject: RE: [backstage] democracyplayer if the BBC started chucking out DRM free open format versions of shows on the web, then it would have a massive impact on the global market - BBC Worldwide has just signed a deal

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-19 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Neil Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: As a license payer, and thus a funder of the BBC, I am keen to see the BBC move towards covering costs as much as possible by re-using free to listen/view content from the home market and re-sell it abroad wherever a market may exist. To view the issue as

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-18 Thread Dave Crossland
Hi Nic! I'm glad to see that Ian is recommending Free Software and that you took the time to check it out - Thanks, and cheers Ian :-) On 17/12/06, Nic James Ferrier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When is auntie going to be publishing feeds so I can see the headlines from the beeb in

Re: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-18 Thread Nic James Ferrier
Dave Crossland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So that's one reason for the BBC to dump their own-brand NIH-syndrome iPlayer and start publishing video feeds you can consume in Democracy or whatever player you like the most, just like they publish RSS feeds of the news stories. Absolutely. I like

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-18 Thread Jason Cartwright
** This is all my personal point of view ** I'm glad to see that Ian is recommending Free Software and that you took the time to check it out. Nobody mentioned that it was Free Software. I suspect it was recommended by Ian and liked by Nic (and myself) because it's quick, its usable, and it

RE: [backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-18 Thread Ian Forrester
I agree. I strongly agree. I've worked for GNU for 10 years. I've eaten Chinese food with Richard Stallman. I've eaten Indian with Mr Stallman I've been thinking for a while about how to start persuading the BBC of this. I don't think there's a problem persuading people like Ian. I'm

[backstage] democracyplayer

2006-12-17 Thread Nic James Ferrier
So I download democracyplayer based on Ian's recommendation (and the fact that it doesn't trash my debian instance anymore). Gosh it's cool. When is auntie going to be publishing feeds so I can see the headlines from the beeb in democracyplayer? -- Nic Ferrier http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk