Somehow I love the idea of Redmond including anti functionality in to
Vista. links in pretty well to their version of "anti-trust". I
get the feeling that there will be more to come from the Devastate
(my) Reality Medium.
Although I won't be in London for the hack day, I am looking for
On 01/05/07, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kim Plowright wrote:
>
>>> Dear sweet evil Jesus on a pogo stick, don't start that up again!
>
> LOLS
>
>> Ah, before my time and this is the first time I'd seen this
>> writeup (or any writeup as considered).
>
> Refers the honourable gentlem
Kim Plowright wrote:
>
>>> Dear sweet evil Jesus on a pogo stick, don't start that up again!
>
> LOLS
>
>> Ah, before my time and this is the first time I'd seen this
>> writeup (or any writeup as considered).
>
> Refers the honourable gentlemen to archive URL below. Suggests he takes
> a loo
> > Dear sweet evil Jesus on a pogo stick, don't start that up again!
LOLS
> Ah, before my time and this is the first time I'd seen this
> writeup (or any writeup as considered).
Refers the honourable gentlemen to archive URL below. Suggests he takes
a look. You know, just so he understands w
Tom Scott wrote:
>> This might help:
>> "A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection"
>> Or
>> "How Microsoft destroyed the Mulitmedia PC"
>
> Dear sweet evil Jesus on a pogo stick, don't start that up again!
:D
Ah, before my time and this is the first time I'd seen this writeup (or any
This might help:
"A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection"
Or
"How Microsoft destroyed the Mulitmedia PC"
Dear sweet evil Jesus on a pogo stick, don't start that up again!
Serious question though while the list traffic is low: does anyone on
the BBC side of things know when we'll b
6 matches
Mail list logo
