Steve Hermann (who is the Editor of BBC News Interactive) has just
blogged this response to the Newssniffer app.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2006/10/sniffing_out_edits.html
He goes into a fair bit of detail outlining the revision/iterative
changes to BBC News stories that the
!
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil
Winstanley
Sent: 25 October 2006 09:03
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: RE: [backstage] Newssniffer - BBC News site
monitoring
For the complete framework of the public's and BBC's legal
responsibility,
it is worth reading the BBC's disclaimer and House Rules.
You also agree to indemnify the BBC against all legal fees,
damages and
other expenses that may be incurred by the BBC as a result of your
breach of the
l WinstanleySent: 25
October 2006 09:03To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.ukSubject: RE:
[backstage] Newssniffer - BBC News site monitoring
I
believe its the publisher of content in Libel cases.
Phil.
From:
[EMAIL PROTE
monitoring
I
believe its the publisher of content in Libel cases.
Phil.
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Martin BelamSent: 24 October 2006 15:44To:
backstage@lists.bbc.co.ukSubject: Re: [backstage] Newssniffer - BBC
News site monitoring
l cases. Phil. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin BelamSent: 24 October 2006 15:44To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.ukSubject: Re: [backstage] Newssniffer - BBC News site monitoring As someone who used to work closely with the BBC community site teams my first thought w
Thanks
Jason,
Interesting stuff...
Ian
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason
CartwrightSent: 24 October 2006 12:56To:
backstage@lists.bbc.co.ukSubject: [backstage] Newssniffer - BBC
News site monitoring
Thought this might
be of
J,
re: http://newssniffer.newworldodour.co.uk/bbc/threads/mostcensored
This is one of the most insiteful sites I have ever
seen.
Very sadly it appears that Auntie is taking it upon
herself to remove comments that, on the face of it, do not appear to break any
of the house rules for "have
As someone who used to work closely with the BBC community site teams my first thought was what happens when the BBC pulls posts for legal reasons, and this site reproducesthem - who ends up potentially legally liable - the site re-hosting the content, the BBC, or the original poster, even though
One thing that might be worth considering in terms of adding and removing comments to have your sayis a ranking function. Consider a model where each new entry gets a relevance score. Then, all those abovea certain rank are kept. I know this isn't exactly what is happening, but would it be
10 matches
Mail list logo