At 12:10 +0100 23/6/06, Simon Huggins wrote:
[Guardian cc'd as they have a Free Our Data column]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:58:19AM +0100, Adam Leach wrote:
This is another point of data collected and gathered using tax/license
fee payers money, yet we can't access it without paying
Adam Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is another point of data collected and gathered using tax/license
fee payers money, yet we can't access it without paying substantial fees.
Until this changes small/spare time developers will not have the
resources to create innovative web sites
[Guardian cc'd as they have a Free Our Data column]
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 12:58:19AM +0100, Adam Leach wrote:
This is another point of data collected and gathered using tax/license
fee payers money, yet we can't access it without paying substantial
fees.
I presume the commercial channels'
Obviously BDS (along with other companies) have a business
model which involves aggregating schedule data and supplying
it to other parties.
(Why is it I always think of something extra to say, after I've sent the
email?)
It's also worth remembering the history behind the particular Act of
The one part of this I *really* don't get is that accurate TV
listing data is only going to generate more viewers. So why
on earth would you want to restrict it?
You would be amazed at how many similar situations there are to this -
there was quite an interesting one recently where
On 23/06/06, Simon Huggins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The one part of this I *really* don't get is that accurate TV listing
data is only going to generate more viewers. So why on earth would you
want to restrict it?
Because 'generating more viewers' is only one part of the value
commercial
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Cowlishaw
Sent: 23 June 2006 12:47
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Publishing TV listings? BDS are after you...
On 6/23/06, Adam Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another point of data collected and gathered
I am sure that BDS do pay the BBC.
The difference here is that the BBC, as Backstage, made the content
available for use...
and as such, has a clear responsibility to BDS, and any other
commercial user, as well as
the members of Backstage, to make sure that everyone works within the
BBC's
Quoting Tim Cowlishaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/23/06, Adam Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is another point of data collected and gathered using
tax/license fee
payers money, yet we can't access it without paying substantial
fees.
I should point out here that BDS are not funded by the
, backstage.bbc.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Cowlishaw
Sent: 23 June 2006 12:47
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Publishing TV listings? BDS are
after you...
On 6/23/06, Adam Leach [EMAIL PROTECTED
So just to make absolutely clear. The BBC will continue to make ourlistings available for free (as part of the TV Anytime feed) and we arekeen for developers as part of the remit of backstage to continue to be
able to create and be innovative with the usage of that data.That's all fine, but just
So just to make absolutely clear. The BBC will continue to make our
listings available for free (as part of the TV Anytime feed) and we are
keen for developers as part of the remit of backstage to continue to be
able to create and be innovative with the usage of that data.
That's all fine, but
James-
Looks like you got the same email that Andrew Flegg
of http://www.bleb.org/got, he manage
to get agreement from BDS that using the bbc tvanytime data doesn't require a
fee being paid but he's had to remove the ITV data. You would of thought
that tv companies would love for everyone
This is another point of data collected and gathered using tax/license
fee payers money, yet we can't access it without paying substantial
fees.
Until this changes small/spare time developers will not have the
resources to create innovative web sites and ideas that BBC Backstage
are trying to
Adam Leach wrote:
This is another point of data collected and gathered using tax/license
fee payers money, yet we can't access it without paying substantial fees.
The BBC data seems to be fine, someone said. Remember the days when the
Radio Times had BBC and the TV Times had ITV? It's like
15 matches
Mail list logo
