Re: [backstage] Browser Stats

2007-03-31 Thread Andy
On 30/03/07, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The next round number above 0.4% is 0.5%. Yes, but I was stating what I would have expected the value to be, not stating the value presented with some rounding. On a sample of visitors to BBC home page - an inflation of over 1000% (as

Re: [backstage] Browser Stats

2007-03-31 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 31/03/07, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then maybe there is something to your conspiracy theory. Seem as the BBC's stats disagree with the BBC news articles. Something is not quite right wouldn't you agree? Either: 1. Browser stats are inaccurate 2. BBC news article is wrong 3. The BBC is

Re: [backstage] Browser Stats

2007-03-31 Thread vijay chopra
On 31/03/07, Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31/03/07, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then maybe there is something to your conspiracy theory. Seem as the BBC's stats disagree with the BBC news articles. Something is not quite right wouldn't you agree? Either: 1. Browser stats are

Re: [backstage] Browser Stats

2007-03-31 Thread Peter Bowyer
On 31/03/07, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31/03/07, Peter Bowyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 31/03/07, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then maybe there is something to your conspiracy theory. Seem as the BBC's stats disagree with the BBC news articles. Something is not