Noah Slater wrote:
On 06/12/2007, Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact isn't the bulk of this thread concerned with the way in which
Perl On Rails will be non proprietary.
Not really, proprietry is the wrong word to use here. The word free
is much more descriptive. It is perfectly possible
Steve Jolly wrote:
To eliminate confusion, I propose that we in future refer to the FSF
definition of free as GNU/Free. I thank you.
Or you could say 'free software, as defined by the Free Software
Foundation', which is more accurate and doesn't fall into the logical
trap of everything having
At 18:25 +0200 6/12/07, Martin Belam wrote:
The difference is that the BBC could drop the probability to zero by
not requiring the use of proprietary software...
Or by closing the list if it was deemed to be an unhelpful echo
chamber that wasn't beneficial to the BBC for the amount of
On 07/12/2007, Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matt Lee wrote:
Steve Jolly wrote:
To eliminate confusion, I propose that we in future refer to the FSF
definition of free as GNU/Free. I thank you.
Or you could say 'free software, as defined by the Free Software
Foundation',
Stone free
The Jimi Hendrix version.
Smoke free
All flights.
fre
The Tivo version.
It seems the romance languages avoid the pitfall by sensibly having
two words for the two ideas, just like for penguins. So I'm on a
one-man campaign to import 'libre' into English.
Sean
-
Sent via the
Matt Lee wrote:
Steve Jolly wrote:
To eliminate confusion, I propose that we in future refer to the FSF
definition of free as GNU/Free. I thank you.
Or you could say 'free software, as defined by the Free Software
Foundation', which is more accurate and doesn't fall into the logical
trap of
Matthew Cashmore wrote:
I'm at a conference in LA at the moment about Next Gen technologies and
we've just been shown this as the 'Next Big Thing in TV' - I'd be really
interested in everyone's thoughts
http://pages.tvunetworks.com/index.html
Please correct me if I'm mistaken, but ... is
Matthew Cashmore wrote:
I'm at a conference in LA at the moment about Next Gen technologies and
we've just been shown this as the 'Next Big Thing in TV' - I'd be really
interested in everyone's thoughts
http://pages.tvunetworks.com/index.html
I'd love to have some, but since it appears to
TVU's alright, it's probably one of the more user-friendly IPTV solutions.
I've used this kind of IPTV streaming on occasion in the past few years to
get feeds of F1 races (to watch the F1 whilst I was at uni where I didn't
have a TV or even TV signal (!)) or to watch american networks like the US
On 07/12/2007, Matthew Cashmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pages.tvunetworks.com/index.html
P2P video streaming is very cool. Windows Media Player based products
are very proprietary. Avoid :-)
--
Regards,
Dave
Personal opinion only!
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group.
I'm at a conference in LA at the moment about Next Gen technologies and we've
just been shown this as the 'Next Big Thing in TV' - I'd be really interested
in everyone's thoughts
http://pages.tvunetworks.com/index.html
m
___
Matthew Cashmore
Development Producer
BBC
11 matches
Mail list logo
