Re: [backstage] The BBC as sheep... and irresponsible ones too

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:59 +, David Greaves wrote: > Err, that would be the point... > > And given that your plot would even work, how many spods on eBay have access > to > a magnetic force microscope? > > Obviously the word spods includes BBC reporters (note, not "journalist") > incapable

Re: [backstage] The BBC as sheep... and irresponsible ones too

Can I just point out that I *didn't* write that. That was David's comment. Thanks, R. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 1:13 AM, Mr I Forrester wrote: >> Richard Lockwood wrote: >> In this day and age it *is* important to teach people about electronic >> security. >> >> This "story" completely fails to

[backstage] Commenting on the BBC Trust "Project Canvas" consultation

To bring the "Project Canvas" consultation a little more onto the web, we've republished the document at: http://writetoreply.org/ukgovoss/ URIs are available at the section an paragraph level, so if you don't want to comment on-site, and maybe decide to blog a response on your own site, you can

Re: [backstage] The BBC as sheep... and irresponsible ones too

Phil Lewis wrote: > On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 14:59 +, David Greaves wrote: >> Err, that would be the point... >> >> And given that your plot would even work, how many spods on eBay have access >> to >> a magnetic force microscope? >> >> Obviously the word spods includes BBC reporters (note, not "