i would like a data feed of all the BBC Have Your Say responses which
have a) been most recommended and b) feature a large amount of capital
letters (eg BOYCOTT CHINA). That way, you could launch a very low
cost newspaper to rival the Daily Express/Mail without any real
journalism.
And thank-you
) as
to the reliablity of the result...
martin
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Brian Butterworth
*Sent:* 26 September 2007 17:15
*To:* backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
Martin,
Did you read
That's possibly a bit of a sledgehammer / nut scenario for a poll like
What should we call the Tikkabilla (Play School for you other
oldies...) hamster?.
:-)
Cheers,
Rich.
On 9/28/07, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin,
On 26/09/2007, Martin Belam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/09/2007, Richard Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's possibly a bit of a sledgehammer / nut scenario for a poll like
What should we call the Tikkabilla (Play School for you other
oldies...) hamster?.
:-)
Cheers,
Rich.
You tell that to Socks and Cookie!
I can't see how you
@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
My apologies... I was in a class of four people in the sixth form that
did a Statistics A-Level
On 26/09/2007, vijay chopra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/09/2007, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 26/09/2007, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remember that ALL the voting where you are asked to pay for the call or
text are simply revenue collection systems, not statistically valid ones.
The adjudicators (on Big Brother for example) simple verify that the
number of calls
Hi all, I have my BBC hat back on at the moment, and one of the things I
am working on is a project to do with online voting and ratings.
Part of my brief is to explore how the BBC might utilise and re-use
information and data gathered via voting, and hopefully make a business
case for releasing
Martin,
Did you read this?
http://media.guardian.co.uk/broadcast/comment/0,,2175214,00.html
Comment
--
If you think the nation decides, think again
Via phone-in, vote and blog, a vocal minority appears to be speaking for the
silent majority
*Carol Sarler
Sunday
suited to the pub than this mailing list ;-)
martin
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Butterworth
Sent: 26 September 2007 17:15
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
Martin,
Did you
Whilst I applaud your effort, I inherently distrust online polls, and cs
disclaimed on a site that we're all familiar with:
This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers,
dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything
important, you're insane.
So
September 2007 18:54
To: backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
Subject: Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
Whilst I applaud your effort, I inherently distrust online polls, and cs
disclaimed on a site that we're all familiar with:
This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers,
dynamic IPs
At 17:40 +0100 26/9/07, Martin Belam wrote:
No I hadn't, thanks for pointing it out. I used to be Senior
Producer on Online Voting at the BBC for a couple of years, and so I
have some quite strong opinions about when it is right to run an
online vote and when the correct reaction is You did
On 26/09/2007, Christopher Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Leaving the last digit from the last octet out would be fine, though?
Then you could group by IP addresses for purposes like fraud checking and
suchlike. I'm sure the BBC sites always say that standard information such
as browser and
to the pub than this mailing list ;-)
martin
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Brian Butterworth
*Sent:* 26 September 2007 17:15
*To:* backstage@lists.bbc.co.uk
*Subject:* Re: [backstage] Voting data ideas
Martin,
Did you
14 matches
Mail list logo
