Re: [BackupPC-users] ssh problem

2008-07-03 Thread Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)
serge pecher wrote: > I had backuppc working for a while without problems. > > After, I think, an update I am in trouble with ssh (can't read 4 > bytes) > > When I try to ssh -l root to the client as backuppc user it keeps > asking the root password. > > I tried an update of openssl on both ma

Re: [BackupPC-users] ssh problem

2008-07-03 Thread Tino Schwarze
Hi Serge, On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:13:50AM +0200, serge pecher wrote: > I had backuppc working for a while without problems. > > > After, I think, an update I am in trouble with ssh (can't read 4 bytes) > > > When I try to ssh -l root to the client as backuppc user it keeps asking the > roo

Re: [BackupPC-users] very slow compression of big file

2008-07-03 Thread Tony Schreiner
Evren Yurtesen wrote: > Renke Brausse wrote: >> Hello Tony, >> >>> I've written before about backups involving very big files that >>> seem to execute slowly. >>> >> >>> What can be slowing things down so much? Except for this operation, >>> everything else runs about as I would expect. >> >> I

[BackupPC-users] ssh problem

2008-07-03 Thread serge pecher
Hello, I had backuppc working for a while without problems. After, I think, an update I am in trouble with ssh (can't read 4 bytes) When I try to ssh -l root to the client as backuppc user it keeps asking the root password. I tried an update of openssl on both machines (where up to date)

Re: [BackupPC-users] very slow compression of big file

2008-07-03 Thread Evren Yurtesen
Renke Brausse wrote: > Hello Tony, > >> I've written before about backups involving very big files that seem >> to execute slowly. >> > >> What can be slowing things down so much? Except for this operation, >> everything else runs about as I would expect. > > I have no clue what the reason i

Re: [BackupPC-users] very slow compression of big file

2008-07-03 Thread Renke Brausse
Hello Tony, > I've written before about backups involving very big files that seem > to execute slowly. > > What can be slowing things down so much? Except for this operation, > everything else runs about as I would expect. I have no clue what the reason is but I experienced that backups of

[BackupPC-users] very slow compression of big file

2008-07-03 Thread Tony Schreiner
I've written before about backups involving very big files that seem to execute slowly. I am watching one right now. The source file is 57G in size. Based on the output of lsof, it appears that at the momentthe RStmp file is being compressed into its backup location (and by experience w

Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2003 via smb copy only directories

2008-07-03 Thread Les Mikesell
Neimar Volpini wrote: > Hum, good point, the timestamps didn't came in mind ... but I don't > think this is the problem because there were old files in the directory > and none of them were copied. Let me understand something ... > > I run a full backup of two directories in a share. After, I ch

Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2003 via smb copy only directories

2008-07-03 Thread Tino Schwarze
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 02:35:55PM -0300, Neimar Volpini wrote: > Hum, good point, the timestamps didn't came in mind ... but I don't > think this is the problem because there were old files in the directory > and none of them were copied. Let me understand something ... > > I run a full backup

Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2003 via smb copy only directories

2008-07-03 Thread Neimar Volpini
Hum, good point, the timestamps didn't came in mind ... but I don't think this is the problem because there were old files in the directory and none of them were copied. Let me understand something ... I run a full backup of two directories in a share. After, I change the config adding a third

Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2003 via smb copy only directories

2008-07-03 Thread Les Mikesell
Neimar Volpini wrote: > Craig, its an incremental backup however the files weren't copied in any > previous backup. Are the timestamps on the files earlier than your last full backup? > Well, I just removed all the backups for this host and tried again, for > my surprise it works ... very stran

[BackupPC-users] SMB Signature verification failed - windows 2003

2008-07-03 Thread Neimar Volpini
I'm copying a windows 2003 share and at certain point during the copy I receive this error: client_check_incoming_message: received message with mid 8341 with no matching send record. SMB Signature verification failed on incoming packet! Server packet had invalid SMB signature! listing \Diversos

Re: [BackupPC-users] Windows 2003 via smb copy only directories

2008-07-03 Thread Neimar Volpini
Craig, its an incremental backup however the files weren't copied in any previous backup. When I browse the backups via CGI no files are shown just the empty directories. Also in the log we can see that the directories were created - if they existed in previous backups they wouldn't be created

[BackupPC-users] problem backuppc

2008-07-03 Thread fatima ech-charif
hi i got this problem when i backup with smb : 2008-07-02 12:00:01 full backup started for share docs$ 2008-07-02 12:00:04 Got fatal error during xfer (No files dumped for share docs$) 2008-07-02 12:00:09 Backup aborted (No files dumped for share docs$) 2008-07-02 12:05:03 no ping response 2008-07

Re: [BackupPC-users] cant do any backups

2008-07-03 Thread Holm Kapschitzki
Les Mikesell schrieb: > Holm Kapschitzki wrote: >> I changed to make all my backups from more than 20 hosts via cronjob. >> >> In config.pl i configured: >> >> $Conf{BlackoutPeriods} = [ >> { >> hourBegin => 19.0, >> hourEnd => 23.5, >> weekDays => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], >> }, >>

Re: [BackupPC-users] Incremental directory structure

2008-07-03 Thread Christoph Litauer
dan schrieb: > just for reference: > > time for i in `seq 1 1`; do mkdir $i; done > > ext3 > real0m15.536s > user0m7.764s > sys0m6.108s > bonnie++ > xfs > real0m14.365s > user0m7.856s > sys0m6.148s > > reiserfs > real0m13.679s > user0m8.053s > sys0m6.024s