Mark writes:
Using rsync between two linux servers, the full took 2.5 hours, the
incremental backups are taking longer each day.
2008-10-21 23:00:01 full backup started for directory /
2008-10-22 02:32:55 full backup 0 complete, 294903 files, 203401100538
bytes, 28 xferErrs (0 bad files, 0
Hi there,
Juste asking you on question on planning execution.
I'd like to disable incremental since i use rsync, and so, full backups
are ok for my needs giving me the same results as incremental.
But, in order to disable incremental, i set Incrperiod to 360 for
incremental, and, 0.97 For full
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre - ArchivTech wrote:
Hi there,
Juste asking you on question on planning execution.
I'd like to disable incremental since i use rsync, and so, full backups
are ok for my needs giving me the same results as incremental.
But, in order
Well, it seem that setting incrperiod to 0 make it working correctly.
Just tried with a host that didn't start, because of high incrperiod
(365), i put that to 0, and on the next hour, the full started!
So, i think it's ok.
Thank you guys :D
Le vendredi 31 octobre 2008 à 19:04 +1100, Adam
Alexandre - ArchivTech wrote:
I'd like to disable incremental since i use rsync, and so, full
backups
are ok for my needs giving me the same results as incremental.
This has been debated over and over again, but really doing a mix of
full and incremental backups is best for most
Mark Maciolek escribió:
hi,
Using rsync between two linux servers, the full took 2.5 hours, the
incremental backups are taking longer each day.
2008-10-21 23:00:01 full backup started for directory /
2008-10-22 02:32:55 full backup 0 complete, 294903 files, 203401100538
bytes, 28
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:16:05PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I must be missing something on this whole compression, pooling, and
checksum matter.
I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same checksum (one is _0)
but 'cmp' to different values. However, when I zcat them, they have
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 23:16:05 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] 2
cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same
zcatt'ed content?]:
[...]
I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same checksum (one is _0)
but 'cmp' to different values. However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexandre - ArchivTech wrote:
Well, it seem that setting incrperiod to 0 make it working correctly.
Just tried with a host that didn't start, because of high incrperiod
(365), i put that to 0, and on the next hour, the full started!
So, i
Alexandre - ArchivTech wrote:
Hi there,
Juste asking you on question on planning execution.
I'd like to disable incremental since i use rsync, and so, full backups
are ok for my needs giving me the same results as incremental.
Just so you know, rsync full backups take quite a bit
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
The deeper I probe into this, the more confused I get and the more I
worry about data integrity on my system...
Do a restore to a temporary location and then compare the original with
the restore using the diff command:
diff -r /path/to/original/* /path/to/restore/*
Holger Parplies wrote at about 12:25:08 +0100 on Friday, October 31, 2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30 23:16:05 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] 2
cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same
zcatt'ed content?]:
[...]
I found 2 files in my
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 12:20:50 +0100 on Friday, October 31, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:16:05PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
I must be missing something on this whole compression, pooling, and
checksum matter.
I found 2 files in my cpool that have the same
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the
rsync checksum seed and which ones don't???
I think you are kind of missing the point that they could both be
corrupted in other ways...
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, thank you for your answer.
I want only full backup not to make it more complicated into customer
head :D
It's a bit hard ton make them understand what's the little difference
between one and another, btw with full backup, i'm sure that all the
files are checked each time, even if it takes a
OK - since my nfs doesn't seem to be working, I now tried installing
BackupPC directly on my NAS device (dns-323).
When I run config.pl, I get the following error message:
Error loading BackupPC::Lib: Bareword compareLOGName not allowed
while strict subs in use at lib/BackupPC/Lib.pm
Alexandre - ArchivTech wrote:
Hi, thank you for your answer.
I want only full backup not to make it more complicated into customer
head :D
It's a bit hard ton make them understand what's the little difference
between one and another, btw with full backup, i'm sure that all the
files are
I have email notifications setup in the config.pl, I got an email
telling me I had some folders that were not in the hosts file, but when
the backup failed for two days straight I didn't get any email
notification, is there something specific I need to do?
Lee Connell
Ammonoosuc Computer
John Rouillard wrote at about 20:13:15 + on Thursday, October 30, 2008:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:04:26AM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Holger Parplies wrote at about 11:29:49 +0100 on Thursday, October 30,
2008:
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-30
Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:27:20 -0500 on Friday, October 31, 2008:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the
rsync checksum seed and which ones don't???
I think you are kind of missing the point that they could both be
I am having this *exact* issue. However, I run a dedicated apache
server for BackupPC that I compiled myself. No modules are loaded
except mod_perl and mod_unique_id is not statically compiled either.
I've never had issue with starting the apache server like yourself.
However, I do have
Lee A. Connell wrote:
I have email notifications setup in the config.pl, I got an email
telling me I had some folders that were not in the hosts file, but when
the backup failed for two days straight I didn’t get any email
notification, is there something specific I need to do?
Wait
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-31 15:26:58 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] 2
cpool files with same checksum, different (compressed content) but same
zcatt'ed content?]:
Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:27:20 -0500 on Friday, October 31, 2008:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Is
Jeff writes:
Is there a (reasonably easy) way of identifying which ones have the
rsync checksum seed and which ones don't???
I'm relucant to even say, because you are heading in an unproductive
direction. But here goes: a compressed file without checksums starts
with 0x78 and a compressed
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-31 13:25:20 -0400 [[BackupPC-users] Error
installing BackupPC: - Bareword compareLOGName not allowed]:
When I run config.pl, I get the following error message:
Error loading BackupPC::Lib: Bareword compareLOGName not allowed
while strict
Hi,
I wrote on 2008-11-01 02:37:55 +0100 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Error installing
BackupPC: - Bareword compareLOGName not allowed]:
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-10-31 13:25:20 -0400 [[BackupPC-users]
Error installing BackupPC: - Bareword compareLOGName not allowed]:
[...]
I was
26 matches
Mail list logo
