-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oblivian wrote:
Hello list,
We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04
for quite some time now. However, April 15th, we upgraded BacupPC from
3.0.0 to 3.2.0 (on Ubuntu 8.10) and see a major increase in backup time
Hi,
Adam Goryachev wrote on 2009-05-11 22:55:34 +1000 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
BackupPC 3.0.0 - 3.2.0 - Major increase in backup?time consumption.]:
Oblivian wrote:
We've had a BackupPC 3.0.0 installation running smoothly on Ubuntu 8.04
for quite some time now. However, April 15th, we upgraded
The problem with setting up two hosts for the same machine is we are getting an
error when it is on network A. With having it be on the network B, it will
still error on the opposite network. That is what we are trying to avoid.
I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1,
which means it will backup all changed data since the last full.
Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that possibly a large amount of data
changed. So taking a full should address that issue. If you are going
to keep taking incrementals,
MJB_SCE wrote:
The problem with setting up two hosts for the same machine is we are getting
an error when it is on network A. With having it be on the network B, it
will still error on the opposite network. That is what we are trying to
avoid.
What kind of infrastructure do you have? If
Le jeudi 07 mai 2009 à 16:26 -0500, Les Mikesell a écrit :
Paul Mantz wrote:
Hello Everyone,
BackupPC Community Edition3.2.0beta0-1 is now available for Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 4 5, and Suse Enterprise Linux 9 10. To
download, please visit
Thanks Adam, Holger and Mark.
Sometimes the obvious is too obvious... well, for some at least.
=/
Oblivian
mark k wrote:
I believe this has to do with incremental levels, usually set to 1,
which means it will backup all changed data since the last full.
Meaning sometime on 4/15-4/16 that
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Berteaud
dan...@firewall-services.com wrote:
Instead of modifying the package, you can simply create some symlinks so
the logs and configuration are stored on the data disk:
Before installing the rpm (and after having mounted the dedicated
partition in
Paul Mantz wrote:
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Berteaud
dan...@firewall-services.com wrote:
Instead of modifying the package, you can simply create some symlinks so
the logs and configuration are stored on the data disk:
Before installing the rpm (and after having mounted the
