Hello,
Every day I get a message in __LOGDIR__/LOG:
2009-08-12 02:35:49 Cpool is 322.19GB, 1142028 files (860 repeated, 31 max
chain, 11424 max links), 4369 directories
What is the meaning of:
repeated
max chain
max links
Thanks
Matthias
--
Don't Panic
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backuppc at kosowsky.org writes:
The hard link issue has to do with hard links in the *source* not hard
links in the backup (The BackupPC_deleteFile.pl program would be
useless if it couldn't deal with BackupPC's own hard link structure).
Sounds great Jeffrey! Do you mind
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another instance.
This is part of the log file for host steve:
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for directory /
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for directory /
2009-08-12 05:00:06 Rename /media/disk/pc/steve/new
-
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 08:49:23 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another instance.
This is part of the log file for host steve:
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for directory /
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:06:37 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 08:49:23 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another
instance.
...
05:00:06 Running BackupPC_link steve (pid=8901)
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another
instance.
This is part of the log file for host steve:
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for directory /
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another
instance.
This is part of the log file for host steve:
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for
I am setting up a secondary backup server that will backup the contents of
our BackupPC server. My solution is to use tarCreate to create a tar file
which I will then rsync to the 2nd backup server. I cannot get the
tarCreate command to work.
I want to check the status and see what it is going to
Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:19:47 -0500 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another instance.
This is part of the log file for host steve:
2009-08-12 01:00:06 full backup started for directory /
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 11:18:36 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:06:37 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 08:49:23 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely
Here is the scenario I want to set up:
instance #1: normal - backup of user PC's and some of localhost to
local server. Running now, very happy.
instance #2: What I want. use sshfs to mount a remote drive (presumably
through $conf{DumpPreUserCmd} ??), use BackupPC to backup specific files
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 11:18:36 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:06:37 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:00:19 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another
instance.
This is
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:00:19 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
Backuppc has been behaving strangely lately. This is another
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 13:27:17 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 11:18:36 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:06:37 -0400
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:54:05 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:00:19 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:47 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 13:27:17 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:49, Steve Blackwellzep...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
2009-08-12 05:00:08 BackupPC_link got error -3 when calling
MakeFileLink(/media/disk/pc/steve/151/f%2f/froot/f.gconf/fdesktop/fgnome/faccessibility/fkeyboard/f%25gconf.xml,
b32585c3cc30b7ebb556d335a08554e3, 1)
Hello,
dan wrote:
The wiki was made in a very ad-hoc manner. When the discussion hit the
mailing list there wasnt much leadership.. backuppc tends to be mailing list
driven rather than forums or wikis.
I've just look at the (new) backuppc wiki located at:
Hey Cody,
Cody Dunne wrote:
For those of you interested, you can see the current structure of the
wiki at: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~cdunne/files/BPCWikiStructure.png
gives me a 404: Page Not Found.
I haven't heard from anyone interested meeting yet, but I'll still plan
on having it for
You should be able to access it now. It was from 2/13/2009, so it may be
a little off by now.
Cody
phil wrote:
Hey Cody,
Cody Dunne wrote:
For those of you interested, you can see the current structure of the
wiki at: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~cdunne/files/BPCWikiStructure.png
gives me a
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 14:33:54 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 13:27:17 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:24:04 -0400
Filipe Brandenburger wrote at about 14:40:34 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12,
2009:
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:49, Steve Blackwellzep...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
2009-08-12 05:00:08 BackupPC_link got error -3 when calling
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2009-08-12 18:12:09 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
100,000+ errors in last nights backup]:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 14:33:54 -0400 on Wednesday, August 12, 2009:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 11:18:36 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On
Ah - I missed that it was in the Archive-specific configuration section but
just noticed it. That makes sense.
Incidentally, the '-9' gzip takes a bit more CPU but isn't
substantially more effective. Since CPU isn't exactly lacking in this
case it is cranked to -9 just to
save any disk space
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:12:09 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about 14:33:54 -0400 on Wednesday, August
12, 2009:
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:18:04 -0400
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote:
Steve Blackwell wrote at about
Please remove me from this list
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Holger Parplies wrote:
We're in BackupPC_link, not in BackupPC_dump. As the log file shows (XferLOG
for host steve), the backup is apparently run twice in parallel, leading to
the failed rename (only one backup can succeed to rename 'new' to '151',
28 matches
Mail list logo
