Tóth Andor wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I’d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
> membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by
> creating symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some
> built in solutions for this?
>
The cl
Tóth Andor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I?d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
> membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by
> creating symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some
> built in solutions for this?
>
> Regards,
> And
Ed wins.
Ed McDonagh wrote:
> What about the big and little 'm'? 'm'illi/'M'ega... makes quite a lot
> of difference too, even if a millibit/byte isn't a very useful unit!
>
> Ed
>
> On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:09 +0100, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
>
>> Doh! I missed the big B, and I'm a network engine
What about the big and little 'm'? 'm'illi/'M'ega... makes quite a lot
of difference too, even if a millibit/byte isn't a very useful unit!
Ed
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 17:09 +0100, Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> Doh! I missed the big B, and I'm a network engineer. No donut for me!
>
> Tyler
>
> On Wedne
Doh! I missed the big B, and I'm a network engineer. No donut for me!
Tyler
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 16:47:48 Bruce wrote:
> Oh, umn sorry.
>
> I should have been more clear. I was trying to say 100 megabyte (MB)
> per second. Not mbit (mb).
>
> I've actually seen 109MB/s on a couple of inte
Oh, umn sorry.
I should have been more clear. I was trying to say 100 megabyte (MB)
per second. Not mbit (mb).
I've actually seen 109MB/s on a couple of intel nics here.
Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 June 2010 16:07:32 Bruce wrote:
>
>> Some notes on this though. A good profes
What you want to do is create a bonded interface. Here's the Red Hat way:
http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-bond-or-team-multiple-network-interfaces-
nic-into-single-interface.html
And the Ubuntu way:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1423602
Yes, that will help with network throughput
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 16:07:32 Bruce wrote:
> Some notes on this though. A good professional 1GB nic can push about
> 100/MBs. Often you will run into CPU or HD bottlenecks before you get
> this far unless you've got a pretty decent cpu and some type of raid hd
> setup.
I have a no-name ser
On 06/09 04:26 , Jaco wrote:
> Would I be able to setup two nic's on my backuppc server to improve
> network transfer performance to the backuppc server. I usually have a
> least two backups running at the same time on this server. If this
> would be beneficial, what would be the right way of
Hi Guys,
Would I be able to setup two nic's on my backuppc server to improve
network transfer performance to the backuppc server. I usually have a
least two backups running at the same time on this server. If this
would be beneficial, what would be the right way of setting it up?
Thanx,
Jaco
Hello,
I’d like to make host groups, and set configuration according to group
membership (e.g.: webservers, databases). I have made a workaround by creating
symlinks for host configurations, but does BackupPC have some built in
solutions for this?
Regards,
Andor
-
Recently the size of my backup pool has suddenly started growing, by about 1G
per day. I can't sustain that for too long, so I'm trying to figure out where
the differences are coming from. It's hard. I'm using find -size to look for
large files in the cpool, and then find -samefile to map them b
12 matches
Mail list logo
