Hi Ed, looks like this will do the trick thanks but for some reason I'm
now battling to get the SSH keys to work on Ubuntu for the backuppc
account I created. Can you quickly run through the steps you would take
to do this so I can see if I missed something? This is what I did (on
the Ubuntu
Or better,
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/ssh.html#how_can_client_access_as_root_be_avoided
On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 12:19 -0500, Trey Nolen wrote:
>
> Jaco wrote:
> > Ok, so my Backuppc is running perfectly (on my Debian clients) but how
> > do I get Backuppc to backup my Ubuntu clients run
On 6/20/2010 11:56 AM, Lorenzo Franceschini wrote:
> Hi, I'm a newbie, but already very satisfied, BackupPC user.
>
> I have a question: what happens if the BackupPC server is shut down
> (either intentionally or, for example, by a power failure) in the middlle of
> an operation (dump, link, ecc.)
Jaco wrote:
> Ok, so my Backuppc is running perfectly (on my Debian clients) but how
> do I get Backuppc to backup my Ubuntu clients running sudo? Can't get
> SSH to login passwordless with the root account because of sudo...?
> Your help highly appreciated!
>
>
On your Ubuntu clients, ju
Ok, so my Backuppc is running perfectly (on my Debian clients) but how
do I get Backuppc to backup my Ubuntu clients running sudo? Can't get
SSH to login passwordless with the root account because of sudo...?
Your help highly appreciated!
--
On 6/21/2010 11:44 AM, Josh Malone wrote:
...
> When using rsync, only the block differences are EVER sent across the wire
> (unless you add '--whole-files' to the cmdline, IIRC). In backuppc, the
> only difference between a full and an incremental is how rsync determines
> what data to send. In an
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:41:34 -0400, Mike Kallies
wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> I've been using BackupPC in production and at home enviornments for the
> past couple years. It's a great program, but I'll add that it takes a
> while to get the hang of how it does things.
>
> So here's my question.
On 06/21 01:22 , Ian wrote:
> I have disabled some old hosts in the hosts file, but dont want to remove
> the info from the pool, so I commented them out (using a #), will this
> remove the info from the pool?
no, but it will make the host unbrowseable, and cause daily complaint mails
to be sent
Hi,
Possibly a simple question again, cant see anything in the FAQ:
I have disabled some old hosts in the hosts file, but dont want to remove
the info from the pool, so I commented them out (using a #), will this
remove the info from the pool? Or will it leave the pool information (i.e.
still bro
On 18/06/2010 20:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Again, keep in mind that anything on the system can be subverted by a
> good hacker, including these tools and their databases.
>
Agreed with that. The replication of the backup is also a good idea. Thanks for
the help.
Jonathan
10 matches
Mail list logo
