Dear all,
I configured one backuppc in ubuntu10.10 after configured i face one
problem,xfer method is smb all are in dhcp systems
pacews261 is host and dhcp ip is 192.168.1.41
Running: /usr/bin/smbclient pacews261\\D\$ -I 192.168.1.41 -U india -E -d 1
-c tarmode\ full -Tc -
full backup
All
I run backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 on an Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx. In the CGI-GUI
there is no data at all. Only the timestamp and table-headers are
shown.
There is neither a link 'Edit Config' nor 'Edit Host'. (only Wiki
etc.)
According the backupbc-LOG the backup is running regularly. The
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:46 +0200, Urs Forster wrote:
All
I run backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 on an Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx. In the CGI-GUI
there is no data at all. Only the timestamp and table-headers are
shown.
There is neither a link 'Edit Config' nor 'Edit Host'. (only Wiki
etc.)
With
Greetings,
I would like to add some automation to the CGI interface. Firstly, in the Xfer
config screen for Rsyncd or SMB hosts, I would like to make the
Rsync/SmbShareName fields smarter so that when you click add you get a
selection box or dropdown menu of all available rsync/SMB shares. It
Hi dear all
I am new one for Backuppc
I configured for backuppc in ubuntu 10.10 after i configured i got some errors
1.[ skipped 1 lines ]
tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
2.d program
Unknown parameter encountered: pam password change
Ignoring unknown parameter pam password change
Quoting Tyler J. Wagner ty...@tolaris.com:
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 10:46 +0200, Urs Forster wrote:
All
I run backuppc 3.1.0-9ubuntu1 on an Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx. In
the CGI-GUI
there is no data at all. Only the timestamp and table-headers are
shown.
There is neither a link 'Edit Config'
Hello backuppc-users,
I would like to backup all the machines of my company (12 laptops,
Windows/Mac/Linux) in a centralized way on a NAS device.
I like a lot BackupPC and if possible I would like to use it to run the
backups.
Now comes the choice of the NAS... What NAS device would you
Hi Laurent,
I have installed BackupPC on my very low-cost Synology DS110j. My device
is running DSM 3.0 and optware perl.
Installation was not easy at all and I think it will be the same on
other Synology devices.
Performance is also rather poor since my NAS has 128MB of RAM and very
little
lmirg...@microworld.org lmirg...@microworld.org wrote on 05/17/2011
10:23:53 AM:
Now comes the choice of the NAS... What NAS device would you
recommend with a good ratio performance / easy to install BackupPC on
it ?
The ideal situation would be a NAS with BackupPC pre-installed - or
a
On 05/17 11:25 , Timothy J Massey wrote:
One option for using a NAS is to use a standard PC in front of it and
mount the NAS via iSCSI (**NOT** NFS!!!) and use the NAS' storage that
way. That will give you the best results: many have tried to use pools
mounted via NFS, and few (none?)
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom chr...@real-time.com wrote on 05/17/2011
11:40:14 AM:
On 05/17 11:25 , Timothy J Massey wrote:
One option for using a NAS is to use a standard PC in front of it and
mount the NAS via iSCSI (**NOT** NFS!!!) and use the NAS' storage that
way. That will give you
On 5/17/2011 9:11 AM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to add some automation to the CGI interface. Firstly, in the
Xfer config screen for Rsyncd or SMB hosts, I would like to make the
Rsync/SmbShareName fields smarter so that when you click add you get a
selection box or
Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote on 05/17/2011 12:05:15 PM:
Lastly, for various fields throughout the CGI, I would like to
make them drop down menu's with pre-populated options. For instance,
BackupsDisable, i would like the menu to show the Disabled, Manual
Only and Never Backup
On 5/17/2011 10:25 AM, Timothy J Massey wrote:
One option for using a NAS is to use a standard PC in front of it and
mount the NAS via iSCSI (**NOT** NFS!!!) and use the NAS' storage that
way. That will give you the best results: many have tried to use pools
mounted via NFS, and few (none?)
lmirg...@microworld.org skrev 2011-05-17 16:23:
Hello backuppc-users,
I would like to backup all the machines of my company (12 laptops,
Windows/Mac/Linux) in a centralized way on a NAS device.
I like a lot BackupPC and if possible I would like to use it to
On 5/17/2011 12:11 PM, Timothy J Massey wrote:
Bowie Bailey bowie_bai...@buc.com wrote on 05/17/2011 12:05:15 PM:
Lastly, for various fields throughout the CGI, I would like to
make them drop down menu's with pre-populated options. For instance,
BackupsDisable, i would like the menu to
Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
--
Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability
What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know.
Learn how Intel has extended the reach
Thanks Tomasz,
I am not too afraid by the installation issues - even though I would prefer
something working out-of-the-box (or not far from that).
I am more afraid by the performance problems - and I wonder how it would
work on a more recent system. We have a lot of data, and it would be good
Timothy J Massey wrote at about 11:25:12 -0400 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
many have tried to use pools
mounted via NFS, and few (none?) have succeeded. BackupPC is pretty hard
on filesystems, and NFS is fragile.
Not sure where you got that data from. I have been using NFS for 3
years to
Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
No, but it seems like a *really* bad idea -- the concept of slow, off-box,
redundant storage isn't a really good fit with the concepts of pooling and
linking.
Since it's fuse-based, there's the possibility it doesn't
I can say with a great deal of certainty what device you can avoid. The western
digital sharespace line of NAS devices appear to have a bug in their NFS
implimentation that prevents the filesystem from correctly handling hardlinks.
I spent several weeks off and on trying to figure out how I
lmirg...@microworld.org wrote at about 16:23:53 +0200 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
Hello backuppc-users,
I would like to backup all the machines of my company (12 laptops,
Windows/Mac/Linux) in a centralized way on a NAS device.
I like a lot BackupPC and if possible I would like to use it
Timothy J Massey wrote at about 11:48:05 -0400 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
The point was basically any block-level attachment (except maybe USB).
The problem comes from NFS' poor handling of the zillions of hard links
that BackupPC wants to use.
I haven't noticed any NFS problems due to
On 05/17/2011 06:57 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
No, but it seems like a *really* bad idea -- the concept of slow, off-box,
redundant storage isn't a really good fit with the concepts of pooling and
linking.
Since it's
The interest of a NAS is that it provides a strong RAID system with a
lightweight Linux system on top - and this at a reasonable price.
If you want a good RAID system on a standard server/desktop it becomes
really more expensive (as RAID systems are generally not in the default
configuration).
Timothy J Massey wrote at about 12:11:58 -0400 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
Given that Craig is working on a significant rewrite for BackupPC 4.0,
this may be something that would be best worked on there, while major
things are changing anyway.
Good point to consider..
Also, the new system
From: audire...@live.com
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:40:02 +0530
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] tree connect failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED
Dear all,
I configured one backuppc in ubuntu10.10 after configured i face
Les Mikesell wrote at about 11:20:12 -0500 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
On 5/17/2011 10:25 AM, Timothy J Massey wrote:
One option for using a NAS is to use a standard PC in front of it and
mount the NAS via iSCSI (**NOT** NFS!!!) and use the NAS' storage that
way. That will give you the
On 5/17/2011 11:57 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
No, but it seems like a *really* bad idea -- the concept of slow, off-box,
redundant storage isn't a really good fit with the concepts of pooling and
linking.
Actually the
Michael Stowe wrote at about 11:57:42 -0500 on Tuesday, May 17, 2011:
Has anyone tried using BackupPC and MooseFS (http://www.moosefs.org/)?
No, but it seems like a *really* bad idea -- the concept of slow, off-box,
redundant storage isn't a really good fit with the concepts of
On 5/17/2011 12:11 PM, lmirg...@microworld.org wrote:
The interest of a NAS is that it provides a strong RAID system with a
lightweight Linux system on top - and this at a reasonable price.
If you want a good RAID system on a standard server/desktop it becomes
really more expensive (as RAID
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky backu...@kosowsky.org wrote on 05/17/2011 01:11:16
PM:
I haven't noticed any NFS problems due to hard links.
I get approximately the same speed of transfer operations when I am
reading/writing regular file or massively hard-linked ones.
In my experience, the issue with
lmirg...@microworld.org lmirg...@microworld.org wrote on 05/17/2011
01:11:42 PM:
The interest of a NAS is that it provides a strong RAID system with
a lightweight Linux system on top - and this at a reasonable price.
Yeah... No. No it does not. It provides *EXACTLY* the same RAID system
Hi,
I'm running into problems by using backuppc with dhcp clients which are
using a different subnet then the backuppc server.
(It's not possible to use backuppc server and clients in the same subnet
in this case. DNS Server doesn't accept DynamicDNS entries.)
Error:
Backup Process don't
On 05/17 02:05 , Timothy J Massey wrote:
lmirg...@microworld.org lmirg...@microworld.org wrote on 05/17/2011
01:11:42 PM:
The interest of a NAS is that it provides a strong RAID system with
a lightweight Linux system on top - and this at a reasonable price.
Yeah... No. No it does
On 5/17/2011 2:06 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
The interest of a NAS is that it provides a strong RAID system with
a lightweight Linux system on top - and this at a reasonable price.
Yeah... No. No it does not. It provides *EXACTLY* the same RAID system
that you can get with *any*
On 05/17 02:30 , Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/17/2011 2:06 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
My advice is to get a 3ware RAID card and whatever disks you like for it.
There's some sharp corners on the management interface; but at least it
*has* a management interface that's consistent and
On 5/17/2011 3:02 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
On 05/17 02:30 , Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/17/2011 2:06 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
My advice is to get a 3ware RAID card and whatever disks you like for it.
There's some sharp corners on the management interface; but at least it
Hi!
I've been using backuppc for ages (more than 3 years) on my home
network, and it works just lovely,
However, after upgrading my server to latest ubuntu (11.04) the
localhost backup fails. The error is no ping response. All the other
machines work fine, but not the server itself. I have
On 5/17/2011 4:46 PM, Magnus Larsson wrote:
Hi!
I've been using backuppc for ages (more than 3 years) on my home
network, and it works just lovely,
However, after upgrading my server to latest ubuntu (11.04) the
localhost backup fails. The error is no ping response. All the other
Hi!
It is called localhost in the /etc/backuppc/hosts file:
hostdhcpusermoreUsers
localhost 0 backuppc
Then there is a localhost.pl.
And yes, I can ping localhost as user backuppc:
$ ping localhost
PING localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64
Hi,
Bowie Bailey wrote on 2011-05-17 12:05:15 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Smarter
CGI]:
On 5/17/2011 9:11 AM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Greetings,
I would like to add some automation to the CGI interface. Firstly, in
the Xfer config screen for Rsyncd or SMB hosts, I would like to make the
Hi,
Magnus Larsson wrote on 2011-05-17 23:08:58 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] No ping
respons on localhost after ubuntu?upgrade]:
[context dropped as I have not yet implemented un-toppost.pl]
localhost 0 backuppc
Then there is a localhost.pl.
regardless of why it doesn't work
43 matches
Mail list logo
