Its not really easy to backup a backuppc, read in the mailing list rsync is not
a good idea because there a lot of hardlinks.
Whats the best way to creat offline backups?
-Original-Nachricht-
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Archive without tarball - directly to the file
system
Date:
Thanks for given replay
how to find out SMB authentication problem
Thanks
Audi
From: ty...@tolaris.com
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 06:24:56 +0100
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] session setup failed: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE
Audi,
You've asked
Hi everyone,
First of all thank you for your advice, I think I'll give XFS a try.
Has anyone tuned XFS with its several mount options?
--
Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago
System administrator
marcos.lore...@andago.com
ÁNDAGO INGENIERÍA
Tlf: +34 916 011 373 Álcalde Ángel Arroyo, 10, 1º
On 24/05/2011 11:25 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
I did a relatively short filesystem comparison when I moved my BackupPC
pool to another set of drives. The high level results:
jfs, xfs: quick, stable
reiserfs: not stable
ext4: slow
ext3: very slow
The not stable designation
http://everything2.com/title/Filesystem+performance+tweaking+with+XFS+on+Linux
Basically when creating the xfs use :
mkfs.xfs -l size=64m
and when mounting use:
mount -t xfs -o noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8 device mountPoint
in fstab:
device mountPointxfs
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 08:58 -0500, Sabuj Pattanayek wrote:
and when mounting use:
mount -t xfs -o noatime,nodiratime,logbufs=8 device mountPoint
As someone recently pointed out to me, nodiratime is a subset of
noatime. Just use noatime.
On 5/25/2011 5:02 AM, samuel_w...@t-online.de wrote:
Its not really easy to backup a backuppc, read in the mailing list rsync is
not a good idea because there a lot of hardlinks.
Whats the best way to creat offline backups?
First, if you are changing topics, please create a new thread rather
On 5/25/2011 6:37 AM, Audi Narayana Reddy wrote:
Thanks for given replay
how to find out SMB authentication problem
If you look in the BackupPC config, you should be able to find the
command it is using to do the backup (SmbClientFullCmd) as well as the
username and password that are being
Sabuj Pattanayek sab...@gmail.com wrote [8:58am -0500]
SP
http://everything2.com/title/Filesystem+performance+tweaking+with+XFS+on+Linux
SP
SP Basically when creating the xfs use :
SP
SP mkfs.xfs -l size=64m
SP
SP and when mounting use:
SP
SP mount -t xfs
On 5/25/2011 8:40 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
2) It does sometimes have problems resurrecting the filesystem when it
has been corrupted, I did lose *one* home directory out of 400 once upon
a time (about 9 years ago...)
Like I said, a filesystem that loses data *sometimes* doesn't really
On 5/25/2011 8:40 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
2) It does sometimes have problems resurrecting the filesystem when it
has been corrupted, I did lose *one* home directory out of 400 once
upon
a time (about 9 years ago...)
Like I said, a filesystem that loses data *sometimes* doesn't really
On 5/25/2011 10:12 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
To be fair, those sometimes are crash situations and it is also a good
idea to run hardware/operating systems/UPS's, that... don't cause that
problem. And to have an offsite copy for the things you can't control.
I'm not arguing against either
Hi,
first of all, my personal experience with reiserfs is also that it lost a
complete pool FS (apparently, the cpool directory disappeared and was
re-created by BackupPC *several times* before I noticed the problem).
Rebuilding the tree obviously gave me a state that is next to impossible
to fix
Has anyone tuned XFS with its several mount options?
some useful info below, which I didn't know (logbsize delaylog). I suspect
it
would increase backuppc performance.
http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ:
Q: I want to tune my XFS filesystems for something
The standard answer you will
So I certainly don't disagree with your results, but I do partly disagree
with your reasoning and interpretations.
Err, actually, you don't ... or perhaps more accurately, I don't disagree
with any of the points you make, so rather than agree with everything you
said individually, I'll skip
On 5/25/2011 1:46 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
I'm really suggesting that the experience of somebody who has run a file
system for a period of time without (for example) a power failure is
likely to have little to contribute to answer the question on how stable a
file system is during a power
http://eliteops.com.au/enterin.html--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
My only other comment I forgot to make in my original response, were the
same options enabled for each of the tested filesystems.
Some filesystems by default enable data and metadata journalling, while
others require an option to enable this (AFAIK).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/05/11 04:59, Les Mikesell wrote:
On 5/25/2011 1:46 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
I'm really suggesting that the experience of somebody who has run a file
system for a period of time without (for example) a power failure is
likely to have little
19 matches
Mail list logo
