I have been wondering about this for a while. Am I better off having
backups run parallel or in series?
By running in series, I mean one backup runs at a time. When it finishes,
another one starts.
By running parallel, I mean that several backups run at once. It seems
that when backups have to
I just depends on any particular setup, and what the most limiting
factor is. Sound like for you it's bandwidth, but that may not always
be true, even for you, depending on how much your data changes from
backup to backup and things like that.
I would argue that if you have so few machines that
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 03:48:20PM -0500, Chris Baker wrote:
I have been wondering about this for a while. Am I better off having
backups run parallel or in series?
By running in series, I mean one backup runs at a time. When it finishes,
another one starts.
By running parallel, I mean
