On 05/14/2016 07:36 PM, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
>> It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reasons for that. Don't
>> you think it might be a good idea to change the project name then and just
>> leave the original project intact?
I appreciate the idea to try and contact Craig Barret
Il 14/05/2016 19:16, Alexander Moisseev ha scritto:
> On 14.05.16 13:04, Juergen Harms wrote:
>> active again once new contributors show up? how to avoid that the
>> initiative that hopefully will get started by this discussion can be
>> mis-interpreted as hijacking? I do not suggest to get lost in
On 14.05.16 13:04, Juergen Harms wrote:
> active again once new contributors show up? how to avoid that the
> initiative that hopefully will get started by this discussion can be
> mis-interpreted as hijacking? I do not suggest to get lost in
It's not hijacking, it's a fork and there are good reaso
On 14-05-2016 13:13, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> Il 14/05/2016 12:04, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
>> That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three
>> is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking.
> VERY true.
>
>> I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be based
Il 14/05/2016 12:04, Juergen Harms ha scritto:
> That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three
> is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking.
VERY true.
> I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be based on (e.g.
> the mailing list, the contents at sourcef
That sounds positive - tres facent collegium - but I doubt whether three
is enough as soon as doing succeeds to talking.
I see a formal issue: what any future activity will be based on (e.g.
the mailing list, the contents at sourcefourge) has been established by
predecessors: who are, for insta
Hi all,
Going back a bit, also check this message:
https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/34753750/
On 2016-05-14 11:18, Mauro Condarelli wrote:
> Il 13/05/2016 23:13, David Cramblett ha scritto:
>> If the group was interested in GitHub, then services/platform for items 1 -
>> 4 woul
Il 13/05/2016 23:13, David Cramblett ha scritto:
> If the group was interested in GitHub, then services/platform for items 1 - 4
> would be available for free with good tools. Also, GitHub is somewhat of an
> industry standard for open source projects now. It also allows for easy
> patching from
Hi,
You are correct. The script as it is, expects a .tar.gz file in
$FILEAREA/target. However, this is the file, not a directory. The script
manages it as a symlink to the actual file so that you do not have to
manually input in BackupPC for every host separately.
Looking at your results (zcat
