On 2017-07-20 20:13, Tim Evans wrote:
On 07/17/2017 12:21 AM, Craig Barratt wrote:
When the tar backup appears to be stalled, please do the following:
OK, full backup has been running since 11pm last night, and appears
hung.
* run ps auxww (options might vary based on which server OS
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:27:30 +0200
Daniel Berteaud wrote:
> Because what you want to achieve is not really backups, but some kind
> of rotative snapshots. There are lots of different ways to do this
> (LVM, LVM-thin, btrfs, zfs etc..), and this is very dependant on
Le 20/07/2017 à 15:54, B a écrit :
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:26:18 +0200
Daniel Berteaud wrote:
I think this is out of BackupPC's scope
Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that?
Why adding a kinda-Xtiple-fugitive-daily-snapshots of only touched files
is
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 08:18:44 -0600
Ray Frush wrote:
> I believe you could do something like you propose with the current
> BackupPC by setting the "IncrPeriod' to 0.04 (1/24 of a day). You'd
> have to make some interesting settings for "FillCycle" and
> "FullKeepCnt"
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:17:29 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> You can set the schedule to run as often as you like, but the
> underlying tools are going to have to traverse the whole directory
> tree to find the touched files, which you probably don't want to
> happen while you
I believe you could do something like you propose with the current BackupPC
by setting the "IncrPeriod' to 0.04 (1/24 of a day). You'd have to make
some interesting settings for "FillCycle" and "FullKeepCnt" to make it keep
a usable schedule, but you could then have 'hourly' incrementals.
As
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 8:54 AM, B wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:26:18 +0200
> Daniel Berteaud wrote:
>
>> I think this is out of BackupPC's scope
>
> Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that?
> Why adding a
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:26:18 +0200
Daniel Berteaud wrote:
> I think this is out of BackupPC's scope
Please develop, don't drop me dry, why is that?
Why adding a kinda-Xtiple-fugitive-daily-snapshots of only touched files
is out of the BPC's scope ? On the other
Le 20/07/2017 à 02:54, B a écrit :
Hi Bacukppcers,
My suggestion is to avoid using such things as FS snapshots during the
day to avoid work losses.
An addition to BPC could do the trick, preferably saving the result in
another directory than the main one, by checking which files have been