Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.5 released (plus new versions of backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc)

OK I'll give it a shot with the V3 config. As far as the configure.pl script goes, it should be included since it is mentioned in the documentation. On 12/18/17 11:35, Daniel Berteaud wrote: Le 18/12/2017 à 14:08, Pete Geenhuizen a écrit : Daniel, I plan on upgrading from v3 to v4, and

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.5 released (plus new versions of backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc)

Le 18/12/2017 à 14:08, Pete Geenhuizen a écrit : Daniel, I plan on upgrading from v3 to v4, and have installed your rpm on a test host, so this is in essence a new install.  According to the documentation to set up /etc/BackupPC/config.pl I need to run configure.pl which appears to be

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Ok thanks, I will look at it if i see the notification tomorrow. i will let you know guys ! 2017-12-18 17:08 GMT+01:00 B : > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:43:35 +0100 > Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > > > Hey ! Indeed, it solves problems sometimes :) > > I reboot

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Debian 8, no disk quota. On /dev/sda1 i have the backuppc pool with 5140GB taken and samba shares with 4.3TB taken 2017-12-18 16:44 GMT+01:00 Stefan Peter : > Dear Adrien Coestesquis > On 18.12.2017 16:15, Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > > Block count:

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:43:35 +0100 Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > Hey ! Indeed, it solves problems sometimes :) > I reboot the machine right now, and I will see tomorrow It may also be tied to another cause which appears quite silly:

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:43:35 +0100 Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > Hey ! Indeed, it solves problems sometimes :) > I reboot the machine right now, and I will see tomorrow If it still goes on, it might also be for this reason: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2316 which you may

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Dear Adrien Coestesquis On 18.12.2017 16:15, Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > Block count:              3906469376 This does not look like the reserved block count hit the limit: > Reserved block count:     195323468 > Free blocks:              1613863920 The inodes look fine, too: > Free inodes:     

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Hey ! Indeed, it solves problems sometimes :) I reboot the machine right now, and I will see tomorrow 2017-12-18 16:38 GMT+01:00 B : > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:15:16 +0100 > Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > > > Thanks for your replay Stefan. > > > > So this is

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

here is the output : FilesystemInodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/sda1 488308736 18304824 4700039124% /backup only 4% used 2017-12-18 16:24 GMT+01:00 Carl W. Soderstrom : > On 12/18 03:15 , Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > >

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:15:16 +0100 Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > Thanks for your replay Stefan. > > So this is related to the 95% and that's why the DfMaxUsagePct change > is not taken ? > > this is the output of tune2fs -l /dev/sda1: … doesn't seems there's any problem. …

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

On 12/18 03:15 , Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > But today i have 4.5TB left and this is sufficient to make backups with my > retention configuration. So why backuppc complains about this ? how 63% > (today's disk utilisation) is superior to 95% ? What is the output of 'df -i'? Could it be that you

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Thanks for your replay Stefan. So this is related to the 95% and that's why the DfMaxUsagePct change is not taken ? this is the output of tune2fs -l /dev/sda1: root@bak1:/backup/backuppc# tune2fs -l /dev/sda1 tune2fs 1.42.12 (29-Aug-2014) Filesystem volume name: Last mounted on:

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Dear On 18.12.2017 14:42, Adrien Coestesquis wrote: > Hi BackupPC Users !! > > Since few days I receive notifications which warn me about hosts skipped. > I recently backuped a server which took a lot of place. I was trying to > make only one full backup, then i disabled the backup with the >

[BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

Hi BackupPC Users !! Since few days I receive notifications which warn me about hosts skipped. I recently backuped a server which took a lot of place. I was trying to make only one full backup, then i disabled the backup with the BackupsDisable setting. Now i have 4.5TB left on my FS :

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.5 released (plus new versions of backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc)

Daniel, I plan on upgrading from v3 to v4, and have installed your rpm on a test host, so this is in essence a new install.  According to the documentation to set up /etc/BackupPC/config.pl I need to run configure.pl which appears to be included in the tar file, but isn't in the rpm.  Is

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.5 released (plus new versions of backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc)

Excellent, working just fine now. Thanks Pete On 12/18/17 04:14, Daniel Berteaud wrote: Le 17/12/2017 à 14:35, Pete Geenhuizen a écrit : Daniel, I just tried to install your rpm on Centos 7 which failed with this dependency error Error: Package: BackupPC4-4.1.5-1.x86_64   

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC 4.1.5 released (plus new versions of backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc)

Le 17/12/2017 à 14:35, Pete Geenhuizen a écrit : Daniel, I just tried to install your rpm on Centos 7 which failed with this dependency error Error: Package: BackupPC4-4.1.5-1.x86_64    Requires: par2cmd I have par2cmdline.rpm installed but it doesn't have par2cmd not can I find a