Hi there
Friday, June 15, 2018, 3:06:30 PM, you wrote:
BB> It finally finished after 24 hours. That gives about 13G/hour or about
BB> 3.8M/s.
BB> The CPUs were not busy. That's what I was confused about. I would have
BB> expected to see a bottleneck at some point, but nothing seemed to be
On 6/18/2018 10:55 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> I have another big local backup that's been running all weekend. I am
>> trying sudo/rsync rather than rsyncd or ssh/rsync this time. This
>> directory has millions of small files (and is even
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 9:38 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>
> I have another big local backup that's been running all weekend. I am
> trying sudo/rsync rather than rsyncd or ssh/rsync this time. This
> directory has millions of small files (and is even bigger than the first
> one), so I expect it to
On 6/16/2018 9:34 PM, ED Fochler wrote:
>> On 2018, Jun 15, at 9:06 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>>
>> The CPUs were not busy. That's what I was confused about. I would have
>> expected to see a bottleneck at some point, but nothing seemed to be
>> busy. The CPUs were all at or below 20% and iowait
Hi
I'm using BackupPC 4.1.3 on a CentOS server to back up a bunch of other Linux
servers. In total I have 40 hosts that are backed up daily. All hosts are
backed up with rsyncd, almost identical configs.
I have one server with a lot of files (around 7mil), on multiple partitions.
It's a
