tmas...@obscorp.com wrote:
> Stephen Joyce wrote on 12/29/2008 01:05:44
> PM:
>
>> I assume you're most worried about your server going tango uniform
>> (in a
>
>> fire, simultaneous disk failure, etc), and not "rm -rf *". Correct?
>>
>> Has anyone successfully used BackupPC on a DRBD (http:/
Stephen Joyce wrote on 12/29/2008 01:05:44 PM:
> I assume you're most worried about your server going tango uniform (in a
> fire, simultaneous disk failure, etc), and not "rm -rf *". Correct?
>
> Has anyone successfully used BackupPC on a DRBD (http://www.drbd.org)
> active/passive, or even a
Stephen Joyce wrote:
> I assume you're most worried about your server going tango uniform (in a
> fire, simultaneous disk failure, etc), and not "rm -rf *". Correct?
In my case, I rotate the offsite disk weekly, so worst case is to lose
the current week which is OK for the content it covers. Se
I assume you're most worried about your server going tango uniform (in a
fire, simultaneous disk failure, etc), and not "rm -rf *". Correct?
Has anyone successfully used BackupPC on a DRBD (http://www.drbd.org)
active/passive, or even active/active, cluster? If so, what can you report?
Cheers,
Times Enemy wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> What is the preferred and secure method for using BackupPC to place
> backups, or a copy of the backups, on a remote server?
>
> The goal is to have the local BackupPC ready for most recoveries, and a
> remote, off-site copy if something happens to the local se
Greetings.
What is the preferred and secure method for using BackupPC to place
backups, or a copy of the backups, on a remote server?
The goal is to have the local BackupPC ready for most recoveries, and a
remote, off-site copy if something happens to the local set.
.te
