On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 23:51:51 +0100
Patrik Janoušek wrote:
> I've read compression in BackupPC is much better than in ZFS. So is it
> not true? Should I definitely use compression in ZFS or is there any
> reason to use BackupPC compression?
> I've found BackupPC use zlib and ZFS use lz4 that is mu
On 24.1.2018 19:46, Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>
> On 01/24/2018 07:42 PM, Patrik Janoušek wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I'd like to ask if is it better to use compression in BackupPC or in
>> ZFS. I don't want to use dedup, so the only criteria is CPU
>> time/Compression ratio.
>> I usually back up files like ph
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 18:42:23 CET Patrik Janoušek wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to ask if is it better to use compression in BackupPC or in
> ZFS. I don't want to use dedup, so the only criteria is CPU
> time/Compression ratio.
> I usually back up files like photos and docs.
If you use lz4 c
On 01/24/2018 07:42 PM, Patrik Janoušek wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to ask if is it better to use compression in BackupPC or in
ZFS. I don't want to use dedup, so the only criteria is CPU
time/Compression ratio.
I usually back up files like photos and docs.
--
Patrik
Hello Patrik,
ZFS gives you a
Hello,
I'd like to ask if is it better to use compression in BackupPC or in
ZFS. I don't want to use dedup, so the only criteria is CPU
time/Compression ratio.
I usually back up files like photos and docs.
--
Patrik
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
