Maarten te Paske wrote:
>
>>> I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to
>>> install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd.
>> Most unix-like systems already have sshd, rsync and tar installed and
>> windows can use the admin file shares for clientless backup.
>
> Ev
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:03AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Maarten te Paske wrote:
>
> > I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to
> > install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd.
>
> Most unix-like systems already have sshd, rsync and tar installed and
> win
Maarten te Paske wrote:
>
>> - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses
>> stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup.
>
> I do not really consider this an advantage. Either way you have to
> install and configure a client: rsync or bacula-fd.
Most unix-like sys
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 08:43:30PM +0200, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote:
> Arch Willingham wrote:
>
> > I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried
> > to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as
> > compared to the other but found nothing very
>
>
> This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can
> identify.) Because the client is native, it can store the native metadata
> (eg. Windows ACLs) more completely.
>
The Bacula client also has native VSS support for backing up open files on
Windows XP/2003.
Mike
---
--On Sunday, July 20, 2008 8:43 PM +0200 "Nils Breunese (Lemonbit)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Bacula uses a Bacula agent on each host you backup, BackupPC uses
> stock rsync(d)/tar/smbclient on the hosts you backup.
This is a case where Bacula has an advantage. (The only one I can
identify
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:38:13 +0200
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC vs. Bacula
[... snip ...]
IMHO the biggest difference is the pooling feature backuppc offers.
There is nothing like this in bacula at the mom
Ralf Gross wrote:
> Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) schrieb:
>> Arch Willingham wrote:
>>
>>> I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried
>>> to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as
>>> compared to the other but found nothing very informative. Any ideas-
Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) schrieb:
> Arch Willingham wrote:
>
> > I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried
> > to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as
> > compared to the other but found nothing very informative. Any ideas-
> > thoughts fro
Arch Willingham wrote:
> I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried
> to find a comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as
> compared to the other but found nothing very informative. Any ideas-
> thoughts from anyone out there?
- BackupPC is more geared
I have been looking at (and installed) both packages. I have tried to find a
comparison of the advantages and disadvantages of each as compared to the other
but found nothing very informative. Any ideas-thoughts from anyone out there?
Thanks,
Arch
---
11 matches
Mail list logo
