I've been wondering about this today, it seems feasible given the way
the bacula-fd operates. It uses mostly textual commands over the wire
between the director, fd and storage daemon. Just brainstorming here, it
should be possible to construct an interface onto bacula-fd. What I was
thinking a
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Has anyone looked at using the bacula client as another
> transfer method? I'm not sure how it handles incrementals
> but using the native backup api on windows clients might
> have some advantages.
>
The bacula client also has the same problem of not being able to
intellig
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 08:09, Rodrigo Real wrote:
> I thinks this is closely related to what is in the plans for BackupPC,
> have a look below:
>
> , http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/roadMap.html
> | Replacing smbclient with the perl module FileSys::SmbClient. This
> | gives much more direc
"govind raj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Govind
> For incremental backups of Windows machines (running XP/NT/2000/2003),
> we find that any files copied into directory that needs to be backed
> up is not getting covered under the incremental backup. However, if
> a new file is added into the s
Hi all,
We are currently using BackupPC 2.1.2 for backing up both Windows XP
andLinux clients.
For incremental backups of Windows machines (running XP/NT/2000/2003),
we find that any files copied into directory that needs to be backed
up is not getting covered under the incremental backup. Howeve
