Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-18 Thread Matthias Meyer
Sorin Srbu wrote: >>-Original Message- >>From: Matthias Meyer [mailto:matthias.me...@gmx.li] >>Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:35 PM >>To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives >> >

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-16 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: Matthias Meyer [mailto:matthias.me...@gmx.li] >Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:35 PM >To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives > >Sorin Srbu wrote: >> Short of makin

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-11 Thread Matthias Meyer
Sorin Srbu wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows > ssh connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh > connections. > > Now, BackupPC uses pings to check if the machine to be backed up is alive. > Since the router in q

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives [solved]

2010-02-08 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: Adam Goryachev [mailto:mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au] >Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:36 PM >To: General list for user discussion, questions and support >Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives > >You have a

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-08 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: Tino Schwarze [mailto:backuppc.li...@tisc.de] >Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:32 PM >To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives > >> Short of making the router visible on t

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-08 Thread Adam Goryachev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Tino Schwarze wrote: > Hi Sorin, > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:29:11AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >> I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows ssh >> connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh

Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-08 Thread Tino Schwarze
Hi Sorin, On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:29:11AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote: > I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows ssh > connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh > connections. > > Now, BackupPC uses pings to check if the machine to be bac

[BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives

2010-02-08 Thread Sorin Srbu
Hi all, I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows ssh connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh connections. Now, BackupPC uses pings to check if the machine to be backed up is alive. Since the router in question doesn’t respond to any ping