Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
Jon Forrest wrote: One reason why I think my idea has promise is because this is how all the commercial backup products I've ever used work. Adding this feature to BackupPC would just bring it closer to the commercial backup products. Don't those products all require a client side agent, at

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Jon Forrest
Les Mikesell wrote: Jon Forrest wrote: One reason why I think my idea has promise is because this is how all the commercial backup products I've ever used work. Adding this feature to BackupPC would just bring it closer to the commercial backup products. Don't those products all require

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Paul Archer
12:56pm, Les Mikesell wrote: Jon Forrest wrote: One reason why I think my idea has promise is because this is how all the commercial backup products I've ever used work. Adding this feature to BackupPC would just bring it closer to the commercial backup products. Don't those products all

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
Jon Forrest wrote: I think it would theoretically be possible to get a target directory listing with the transfer methods that backuppc supports but it wouldn't be trivial. I've started looking at the source code for BackupPC. Too bad there aren't more comments. There's obviously logic

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Jon Forrest
Les Mikesell wrote: I don't think tar is capable of transferring a directory listing without the contents of the files. Since it runs over ssh you could run some other command, but the command isn't guaranteed to exist or to be permitted by the sshd config at the other end. If 'tar' is

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Les Stott
Jon Forrest wrote: Les Mikesell wrote: I don't think tar is capable of transferring a directory listing without the contents of the files. Since it runs over ssh you could run some other command, but the command isn't guaranteed to exist or to be permitted by the sshd config at the other

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
Les Stott wrote: tar -cvf /dev/null the tar to /dev/null actually doesn't take that long at all, maybe a few minutes depending on the size. Gnu tar actually recognizes if stdout is connected to /dev/null (even if you redirect instead of specifying -f) and doesn't bother to read the file

Re: [BackupPC-users] Idea For BackupPC Improvement

2007-12-20 Thread Les Mikesell
Paul Fox wrote: tar -cvf /dev/null the tar to /dev/null actually doesn't take that long at all, maybe a few minutes depending on the size. Gnu tar actually recognizes if stdout is connected to /dev/null (even if you redirect instead of specifying -f) and doesn't