-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:18 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC
for
5 mon
I've been reading a lot. Apparently Rsync over
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:50 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC
for
5 mon
So you still need Cygwin even if you don't have
Well I do have a Linux AD server. I also have a WinServer2008R2 for 6 months,
but it's having issues connecting into the domain for whatever reason. I was
referring to the SSH encryption. I don't recall Samba using encryption for file
transfers, just for user/pass, maybe even just pass.
Are
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:51 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC
for
5 mon
Well I do have a Linux AD server. I also have
Sorin, with your setup, VLANs don't seem out of the question.
In another case, I seem to be figuring out more and more why my machines are
taking so long, Windows and Linux ones included. This PC started backing up
over 8 hours ago. I looked at the PID, nothing. I looked at the Xfer PID,
So what's the maximum amount of incrementals I should do then? For wireless
devices it's best to keep it going and let the server handle the rest, for my
wired computers, I'm assuming anywhere from 6-8 is plenty and I should probably
not do more than that.
On 4/29/2010 2:02 PM, Saturn2888 wrote:
So what's the maximum amount of incrementals I should do then? For wireless
devices it's best to keep it going and let the server handle the rest, for my
wired computers, I'm assuming anywhere from 6-8 is plenty and I should
probably not do more than
Yeah, that's what I meant, depth, not number. There are very few changes to
most of my systems, what does change are the file folders I'm backing up on my
main rig. Those files change daily, but not all of them of course. What are
your thoughts? Probably less level changes are good if there
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:27 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC
for
5 mon
@Sorin Srbu
I'll be excited to hear of your
I've been reading a lot. Apparently Rsync over Cygwin or anything using those
DLLs hangs. I haven't yet felt like upgrading my memory for money reasons, but
I'm wondering if I should include the -W or --whole-file into the Rsync options
for backups. From what I read online, a lot of Windows
Correctioni, it took 8 hours for the full, and as you can see in
http://badmarkup.com/backuppc/majin.png, almost all of the files were already
backed up before.
+--
|This was sent by saturn2...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
Saturn2888 wrote:
I've been reading a lot. Apparently Rsync over Cygwin or anything using those
DLLs hangs. I haven't yet felt like upgrading my memory for money reasons,
but
I'm wondering if I should include the -W or --whole-file into the Rsync
options for backups. From what I read
I don't understand. Which DLLs and what versions? I use DeltaCopy and can't
imagine why I'd not need Rsyncd. Are you saying use it over mounted Samba
shares, or you're telling me to use SSH?
In DeltaCopy, I'm able to just pop in compatible Cygwin DLL files. Cygwin
itself is far too bulky and
Saturn2888 wrote:
I don't understand. Which DLLs and what versions? I use DeltaCopy and can't
imagine why I'd not need Rsyncd. Are you saying use it over mounted Samba
shares, or you're telling me to use SSH?
In DeltaCopy, I'm able to just pop in compatible Cygwin DLL files. Cygwin
Yeah, but with version of the DLL is the newest one in this case that solves
it? I refuse to install Cygwin, but I also can't seem to find that DLL on this
page: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/cygwinports/.
I would still need Cygwin to run an SSH server right or would I just use some
form of PuTTY?
Saturn2888 wrote:
Yeah, but with version of the DLL is the newest one in this case that solves
it? I refuse to install Cygwin, but I also can't seem to find that DLL on
this page: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/cygwinports/.
You really only need to waste the dollar's worth of disk space a cygwin
The $100-worth of writes lowering the life of my SSD for features I don't ever
need nor will ever use in Windows ooor I find someone that has it installed or
could find the DLL and links me :P since I really only need cygwin1.dll. The
cwRsync one is from 1.7.2 which I believe is the version I
Saturn2888 wrote:
The $100-worth of writes lowering the life of my SSD for features I don't
ever need nor will ever use in Windows ooor I find someone that has it
installed or could find the DLL and links me :P since I really only need
cygwin1.dll. The cwRsync one is from 1.7.2 which I
Yeah, I know that. That's why I keep saying, I need the DLL somehow to test if
it will fix this.
+--
|This was sent by saturn2...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Saturn2888 wrote:
Yeah, I know that. That's why I keep saying, I need the DLL somehow to test
if it will fix this.
The cwRsync download would have it in a small package.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
So after installing Cygwin into my RAID of hard drives and waiting the forever
it took, I finally have a cygwin1.dll. I gave up looking through those tar.bz2
files for it.
The cwRsync package had the same old 1.7.2 version of the DLL I already got in
February not the one being proposed.
The
Hey Les, after putting that checksum stuff in, I get a lot of errors which say
verified cached digest. To me that's not an error, that's a good thing right?
+--
|This was sent by saturn2...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
Saturn2888 wrote:
Hey Les, after putting that checksum stuff in, I get a lot of errors which
say verified cached digest. To me that's not an error, that's a good thing
right?
I'm not sure what that means - you might get it once when the values are added
to an existing file that didn't
If that's the case, other computers would show the error too but they do not.
It's only that one PC that has 'em. It shows 139 errors for the last full
whereas the ones before had around 24. The previous fulls used to have a lot of
errors as well, but only because files were vanishing such
Use this as the root directory: http://badmarkup.com/backuppc/
Note, full-backups of laptops or netbooks are done using 100Mbits wired
Ethernet links, everything else is under 802.11g.
Since I can't upload any, here's my most-recent pic of the Host Summary screen.
As you can see, the smallest
On Friday 23 April 2010 00:56:42 Saturn2888 wrote:
@Tyler J. Wagner
If it's confirmed Rsync works better than Rsyncd, I'll switch to it.
The problem with SSH Rsync configurations is the public/private keys. I
seem to always have problems getting those setup, but I've recently not
had those
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:48 AM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC for
5 mon
@Sorin Srbu
I tested each and every new DLL and EXE
Since it was mentioned before, here's iostat:
Every 2.0s: iostat
Fri Apr 23 05:34:51 2010
Linux
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 12:27 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC for
5 mon
@Sorin Srbu
I'll be excited to hear of your
The web server is the one thing that's ever seemingly been fast. There's never
a problem so long as I use it.
+--
|This was sent by saturn2...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
-Original Message-
From: Saturn2888 [mailto:backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com]
Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 1:07 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations Complaints Using BackupPC
for
5 mon
The web server is the one thing that's ever
Saturn2888 wrote:
Since it was mentioned before, here's iostat:
Every 2.0s: iostat
Fri Apr 23
Saturn2888 wrote:
@Les Mikesell
That makes sense then why RAID5 is bad for this.
Now you know my trouble with Samba. Sure, if I can read the files they should
be there, but they're not. This is why I stopped using Samba. It's like
BackupPC get tired when using Samba and quits when it
Tyler J. Wagner wrote:
On Friday 23 April 2010 00:56:42 Saturn2888 wrote:
@Tyler J. Wagner
If it's confirmed Rsync works better than Rsyncd, I'll switch to it.
The problem with SSH Rsync configurations is the public/private keys. I
seem to always have problems getting those setup, but I've
Les Mikesell wrote:
Saturn2888 wrote:
Since it was mentioned before, here's iostat:
Every 2.0s: iostat
On Friday 23 April 2010 14:02:13 Les Mikesell wrote:
Errr... On the backuppc side you want to do this as the backuppc user...
But what you really want it /home/backuppc/.ssh/id_rsa.pub appended to each
remote's /root/.ssh/authorized_keys file (there could be other entries
there already).
On 4/23/2010 8:13 AM, Saturn2888 wrote:
avg-cpu: %user %nice %system %iowait %steal %idle
19.910.042.99 70.840.006.23
But, that 70% iowait number pretty much tells you what the machine is doing
with
most of its time...
I did watch iostat and saw that
I was gonna put it on 2x400GB in RAID0 and having that data backed up on
another rig but didn't think that'd be such a good idea.
As an update, while my graphs haven't updated, my pool info is back! I realized
the extra 100GB was from the new files I wanted to start backing up so that
@Tyler J. Wagner
If it's confirmed Rsync works better than Rsyncd, I'll switch to it. In my
experience, transferring over SSH is only a bit slower than FTP so it should
work just as well. I've also tried adding a -z option into Rsync transfers
outside of BackupPC and noticed that with -z
@Tyler J. Wagner
If it's confirmed Rsync works better than Rsyncd, I'll switch to it. In my
experience, transferring over SSH is only a bit slower than FTP so it should
work just as well. I've also tried adding a -z option into Rsync transfers
outside of BackupPC and noticed that with -z
Saturn2888 wrote:
@Les Mikesell
I thought this was the mailing list. I've seen things frequently posted in
both areas with replies in both areas. I'm assuming that you mean the mailing
list posts to the forums whereas it's not the forum that posts to the mailing
list.
It is a
I've seen so many things on the mailing list. I don't know how to respond, what
program to use if any, if there's some special way to keep track. Think of if
you've never come across a forum before. Someone would have to teach you how to
use it. This is the same thing. Pointing me to where a
Saturn2888 wrote:
I've seen so many things on the mailing list. I don't know how to respond,
what program to use if any, if there's some special way to keep track. Think
of if you've never come across a forum before. Someone would have to teach
you how to use it. This is the same thing.
43 matches
Mail list logo
