also sprach Holger Parplies wb...@parplies.de [2011.04.20.2001 +0200]:
We'd all like to be able to choose an existing *pool file* as
reference - this would save us transfers of *any* file already
existing in the pool (e.g. from other hosts). Unfortunately, this
is technically not possible
Hi,
martin f krafft wrote on 2011-04-17 16:43:07 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Renaming files causes retransfer?]:
also sprach John Rouillard rouilj-backu...@renesys.com [2011.04.17.1625
+0200]:
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely
Holger Parplies wrote at about 20:01:28 +0200 on Wednesday, April 20, 2011:
4.) There *was* an attempt to write a specialized BackupPC client (BackupPCd)
quite a while back. I believe this was given up for lack of human
resources. I always found this matter rather interesting, but
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 15:43 -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
Well... you could write a script (or even one-liner) to do the same name
change (modulof-mangling) on the last backup... this would be pretty easy if
your
name change is well-defined...
What about the file attributes stored in
Dear list,
we are facing a policy change requiring people to rename data files
in a trivial way (replace ':' with '-').
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely, right?
Or is there a way in which I can prepare the server for this change
and
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 09:23:07AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
we are facing a policy change requiring people to rename data files
in a trivial way (replace ':' with '-').
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely, right?
Correct.
Or
also sprach John Rouillard rouilj-backu...@renesys.com [2011.04.17.1625
+0200]:
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely, right?
Correct.
Actually, I just did a test, using iptables to count bytes between
the two hosts, and then renamed
On 4/17/11 2:23 AM, martin f krafft wrote:
Dear list,
we are facing a policy change requiring people to rename data files
in a trivial way (replace ':' with '-').
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely, right?
Or is there a way in
martin f krafft wrote at about 09:23:07 +0200 on Sunday, April 17, 2011:
Dear list,
we are facing a policy change requiring people to rename data files
in a trivial way (replace ':' with '-').
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again,
Dear list,
we are facing a policy change requiring people to rename data files
in a trivial way (replace ':' with '-').
In terms of backuppc, this means that the files will have to be
transferred again, completely, right?
Or is there a way in which I can prepare the server for this change
and
10 matches
Mail list logo