Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2006 07:53, Craig Barratt wrote:
> David Brown writes:
> > I've been using backuppc for several days, and I really like the concept
> > behind it. The web interface is very helpful. However, I'm having a
> > very hard time figuring out what to store the backup filesyste
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:40:46PM -0800, David Brown wrote:
> I've been using backuppc for several days, and I really like the concept
> behind it. The web interface is very helpful. However, I'm having a very
> hard time figuring out what to store the backup filesystem on.
I can tell you that
Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2006 07:53, Craig Barratt wrote:
> David Brown writes:
> > I've been using backuppc for several days, and I really like the concept
> > behind it. The web interface is very helpful. However, I'm having a
> > very hard time figuring out what to store the backup filesyste
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:53:46PM -0800, Craig Barratt wrote:
> The biggest issue is maintaining accurate reference counts so you
> know when to delete unused pool files. The hardlink structure is
> using the file system to maintain reference counts.
>
> There has been some consideration of usi
David Brown writes:
> I've been using backuppc for several days, and I really like the concept
> behind it. The web interface is very helpful. However, I'm having a very
> hard time figuring out what to store the backup filesystem on.
>
> I've tried both XFS and ReiserFS, and both have utterly
I've been using backuppc for several days, and I really like the concept
behind it. The web interface is very helpful. However, I'm having a very
hard time figuring out what to store the backup filesystem on.
I've tried both XFS and ReiserFS, and both have utterly abysmal performance
in the back
