Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-30 Thread Paul Fox
Holger Parplies wrote: > Hi, > > (shouldn't this really be on backuppc-devel?) not if you want feedback from users. > > Ludovic Drolez wrote on 2017-05-30 20:45:35 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] > Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages]: > > > On Fri, May 26, 2017

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-30 Thread Holger Parplies
Hi, (shouldn't this really be on backuppc-devel?) Ludovic Drolez wrote on 2017-05-30 20:45:35 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages]: > > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:34:11PM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: > > >No, rsync-bpc isn't usable without Ba

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-30 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Hi! So I've build rsync-bpc and the Perl module without the included zlib, to make the Debian Security Team happy. I've sent you a pull request for rsync, if you want to make this the default compilation option and if there are no side-effects. BR, Ludo > > So, is it possible to use the

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-29 Thread Ludovic Drolez
Hi ! I've tried to upload the perl module and the modified rsync, but it was automatically rejected because of the use of an embedded zlib library. FYI, the error message: E: backuppc-rsync: embedded-library usr/bin/rsync_bpc: zlib N: N:The given ELF object appears to have been statically

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-27 Thread Alexander Moisseev
On 5/27/2017 8:34 AM, Craig Barratt wrote: No, rsync-bpc isn't usable without BackupPC. Your name sounds fine (although it would be good to have a consistent package name across others flavors - are there any already?). http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/backuppc4/

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-26 Thread Craig Barratt
Ludo, No, rsync-bpc isn't usable without BackupPC. Your name sounds fine (although it would be good to have a consistent package name across others flavors - are there any already?). No, 3.1.2 isn't ready for use. The main upgrade risk area is around rsync config parameters and arguments not

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-26 Thread Ludovic Drolez
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:53:05AM -0700, Craig Barratt wrote: >Ludo, >Cool - thanks! >I'm close to releasing new versions for all the components: BackupPC, >backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc. There are several important bug fixes. Ok, I've started to package rsync-bpc as a new package

Re: [BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-05-25 Thread Craig Barratt
Ludo, Cool - thanks! I'm close to releasing new versions for all the components: BackupPC, backuppc-xs and rsync-bpc. There are several important bug fixes. Also, Yves created a new cygwin-rsyncd-3.1.2.1 package that removes the blat.exe mailer, but still provides an email option (commented

[BackupPC-users] Updated BackupPC 4 Debian Packages

2017-04-01 Thread Raoul Bhatia
Hi! Good news everyone using Debian and it's many derivatives! I've started to experiment with packaging BackupPC 4 for Debian and Debian-based distributions like Ubuntu, Mint, etc. and made great progress. I've successfully tested this on Ubuntu 16.10/Yakkety and Jack did the same for Debian