Hi,
C. Ronoz wrote on 2011-06-30 12:54:44 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users] Yet another
filesystem thread]:
[...]
- How stable is XFS?
unless I missed something, I'd say XFS is perfectly stable - more stable than
reiserfs in any case. The only thing that makes me hesitate with that statement
Holger Parplies wrote:
unless I missed something, I'd say XFS is perfectly stable - more stable than
reiserfs in any case. The only thing that makes me hesitate with that
statement
is Les' remark XFS should also be OK on 64-bit systems - why only on 64 bit
I thought the same thing. I'm
On 7/3/11 12:31 PM, Holger Parplies wrote:
unless I missed something, I'd say XFS is perfectly stable - more stable than
reiserfs in any case. The only thing that makes me hesitate with that
statement
is Les' remark XFS should also be OK on 64-bit systems - why only on 64 bit
systems? [Of
Holger Parplies wrote at about 19:31:14 +0200 on Sunday, July 3, 2011:
While the comments in config.pl state
# This can be set to a string, an array of strings, or, in the case
# of multiple shares, a hash of strings or arrays.
that is actually incorrect. A hash of strings makes no
What filesystem should I use? It seems ext4 and reiserfs are the only viable
options. I just hate the slowness of ext3 for rm -rf hardlink jobs, while
xfs and btrfs seem to be very unstable.
- How stable is XFS?
- Is reiserfs (much) better at hard-link removal?
- Is reiserfs (much) less
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:54 AM, C. Ronoz chro...@eproxy.nl wrote:
I found out that BackupPC is ignoring my Excludes though, while I have a 15GB
/pub partition.
This could explain why the run takes longer, but it should still finish
within an hour?
Rsnapshot runs were always lightning fast,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:56:59AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 5:54 AM, C. Ronoz chro...@eproxy.nl wrote:
I found out that BackupPC is ignoring my Excludes though, while I have a
15GB /pub partition.
This could explain why the run takes longer, but it should still
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, C. Ronoz chro...@eproxy.nl wrote:
I see how you use excludes to exclude back-ups of files with specific
extensions, but then how do I now exclude specific paths per host?
Well, it's not file specific. Some of those are directories.
On a per host basis you just
On 6/30/2011 9:09 AM, C. Ronoz wrote:
I see how you use excludes to exclude back-ups of files with specific
extensions, but then how do I now exclude specific paths per host?
I am planning to back-up about 15 Linux webservers with different roles. Some
host specific archives that take up
What filesystem should I use? It seems ext4 and reiserfs are the only viable
options. I just hate the slowness of ext3 for rm -rf hardlink jobs, while xfs
and btrfs seem to be very unstable.
- How stable is XFS?
- Is reiserfs (much) better at hard-link removal?
- Is reiserfs (much) less stable
On 6/29/2011 10:31 AM, C. Ronoz wrote:
What filesystem should I use? It seems ext4 and reiserfs are the only viable
options. I just hate the slowness of ext3 for rm -rf hardlink jobs, while xfs
and btrfs seem to be very unstable.
- How stable is XFS?
- Is reiserfs (much) better at
C. Ronoz wrote at about 16:31:33 +0200 on Wednesday, June 29, 2011:
What filesystem should I use? It seems ext4 and reiserfs are the only viable
options. I just hate the slowness of ext3 for rm -rf hardlink jobs, while
xfs and btrfs seem to be very unstable.
- How stable is XFS?
-
On 6/29/2011 9:31 AM, C. Ronoz wrote:
What filesystem should I use? It seems ext4 and reiserfs are the only viable
options. I just hate the slowness of ext3 for rm -rf hardlink jobs, while xfs
and btrfs seem to be very unstable.
- How stable is XFS?
- Is reiserfs (much) better at hard-link
13 matches
Mail list logo
