On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
Your point is well-taken and I'm willing to accept
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
an implementation of File::RsyncP in C as opposed to perl.
Your point
On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 15:07:11 -0700
Craig Barratt wrote:
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom writes:
On 09/03 06:22 , Hamish Guthrie wrote:
I am sorry to harp on about this, but, it gets back to my analysis of
rsync under backuppc a few months ago - I still think that we need to do
an
On Fri, 02 Sep 2005 09:46:06 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 08:29, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
impossible to backup my main
Hi,
I'm running a machine with 512MB ram and 1GB swap and BackupPC is
triggering Linux's OOM (the out of memory killer) and that's making it
impossible to backup my main machine.
At the moment VSZ for the 2 _dump processes are at 527m and 425m and
rsync is at 256m (see below). How can I
