John Rouillard a écrit :
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:49:03PM +0200, Matthias Meyer wrote:
Michael Stowe wrote:
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
Not really. But the server runs a lot of weeks without checking the disk.
I feel better if the disk will be
Matthias Meyer wrote:
Is there a way to retain the job queue? Or to check if anything is in it?
Not that I'm aware of.
In theory, storing the job queue over a shutdown shouldn't be tough (it
should just be a matter of writing a construct to a file, and reading it
in on startup). At the
Michael Stowe wrote:
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
Not really. But the server runs a lot of weeks without checking the disk.
I feel better if the disk will be checked regular.
If I determine that there are no errors a couple of month I can stop this
Not really. But the server runs a lot of weeks without checking the disk.
I feel better if the disk will be checked regular.
If I determine that there are no errors a couple of month I can stop this
check anyway.
As a general rule, unless the ext3 file system experiences a crash that
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:49:03PM +0200, Matthias Meyer wrote:
Michael Stowe wrote:
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
Not really. But the server runs a lot of weeks without checking the disk.
I feel better if the disk will be checked regular.
If I
Why not ext4?
works very well on my setup
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:04 PM, higuitahigu...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:17:42 -0500, Michael Stowe
mst...@chicago.us.mensa.org wrote:
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
even worst... why
On Mon, 7 Sep 2009 18:04:55 +1200, Michael michael.auckl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not ext4?
works very well on my setup
well, AFAIK, it also have a inode limit, but the max its too large
to be a problem...
yet, i dont know what default limit it have
but the main
Chris Robertson wrote:
Matthias Meyer wrote:
Hello,
I plan to periodically e2fsck my /var/lib/backuppc.
I want to write a bash script which check if BackupPC_dump is running.
If not, it will stop backuppc, unmount the device and run
e2fsck -fp $device
What is about BackupPC_link? Should
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
Chris Robertson wrote:
Matthias Meyer wrote:
Hello,
I plan to periodically e2fsck my /var/lib/backuppc.
I want to write a bash script which check if BackupPC_dump is running.
If not, it will stop backuppc, unmount
Hi
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 08:17:42 -0500, Michael Stowe
mst...@chicago.us.mensa.org wrote:
By the way, what's the point of doing this? Are your drives unreliable?
even worst... why are you using ext3?
ever think in switching to reiserfs, xfs or jfs? they should
perform
Hello,
I plan to periodically e2fsck my /var/lib/backuppc.
I want to write a bash script which check if BackupPC_dump is running.
If not, it will stop backuppc, unmount the device and run
e2fsck -fp $device
What is about BackupPC_link? Should I check for this process too?
There are further
Matthias Meyer wrote:
Hello,
I plan to periodically e2fsck my /var/lib/backuppc.
I want to write a bash script which check if BackupPC_dump is running.
If not, it will stop backuppc, unmount the device and run
e2fsck -fp $device
What is about BackupPC_link? Should I check for this process
12 matches
Mail list logo
