Le 30/04/2010 00:09, Kris Lou a écrit :
> I emailed the Zmanda folk, and they uploaded the SRPM to the below link.
OK, the RPMs are really not the same at all.
This one, for example, does not provide any SELinux module, there are
probably other differences I've not seen (specfiles are very differe
I emailed the Zmanda folk, and they uploaded the SRPM to the below link.
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 29/04/2010 19:43, Kris Lou a écrit :
> > Out of curiosity, is there a difference (besides version/release of
> > Back
>
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:08:23 +0200
> Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 27/04/2010 20:30, Steve Blackwell a écrit :
>>
>>> BZ=bugzilla?
>>>
>>>
>> Yes :) That is a better place to report package specific issues, all
>> of that SELinus stuff is not really BackupPC
Hello,
Le 29/04/2010 19:43, Kris Lou a écrit :
> Out of curiosity, is there a difference (besides version/release of
> BackupPC) between the Fedora/EPEL rpm and the rpm available from Zmanda?
>
> http://www.zmanda.com/download-backuppc.php
>
> Kris Lou
> k...@themusiclink.net
>
First of all, t
Out of curiosity, is there a difference (besides version/release of
BackupPC) between the Fedora/EPEL rpm and the rpm available from Zmanda?
http://www.zmanda.com/download-backuppc.php
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 201
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:08:23 +0200
Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 27/04/2010 20:30, Steve Blackwell a écrit :
> > BZ=bugzilla?
> >
>
> Yes :) That is a better place to report package specific issues, all
> of that SELinus stuff is not really BackupPC relevant.
>
> > I had alway run
Hello,
Le 27/04/2010 20:30, Steve Blackwell a écrit :
> BZ=bugzilla?
>
Yes :) That is a better place to report package specific issues, all of
that SELinus stuff is not really BackupPC relevant.
> I had alway run SELinux in permissive mode because of the problems I
> was having. After talking
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 18:23:03 +0200
Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 27/04/2010 17:33, Steve Blackwell a écrit :
> > On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:02:58 -0400
> > Steve Blackwell wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'm getting a SELinux AVC when trying to connect to my BackupPC
> >> server.
> >>
> >> I found
Hello,
Le 27/04/2010 17:33, Steve Blackwell a écrit :
> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:02:58 -0400
> Steve Blackwell wrote:
>
>
>> I'm getting a SELinux AVC when trying to connect to my BackupPC
>> server.
>>
>> I found this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512035
>> and in comment 14 i
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
>
> I haven't had an answer to this yet but the folks on the SELinux list
> gave me some instructions on how to fix it. Unfortunately, it did not
> fix the problem because according to them the .pid file and the .sock
> file need to be in the /
On 4/27/2010 10:33 AM, Steve Blackwell wrote:
>
> I haven't had an answer to this yet but the folks on the SELinux list
> gave me some instructions on how to fix it. Unfortunately, it did not
> fix the problem because according to them the .pid file and the .sock
> file need to be in the /var/run d
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:02:58 -0400
Steve Blackwell wrote:
> I'm getting a SELinux AVC when trying to connect to my BackupPC
> server.
>
> I found this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512035
> and in comment 14 it says it was fixed in BackupPC-3.1.0-6.fc11
> whereas I am running:
12 matches
Mail list logo
