2016-01-11 19:04 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> Are you sure the full completely succeeded? If not it might have
> been marked as a 'partial' which would be replaced by a subsequent run
> with more files.
100% sure, i've seen backups marked as "full". Ok for "partial"
backups, but at least 1 full (t
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2016-01-11 18:53 GMT+01:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
> :
>> I would like to add more ram, but i'm waiting for current backup to
>> end from this Friday
>
> Anyway, 2 days ago I had 1 full backup completed. a couple of hours
> aft
2016-01-11 18:53 GMT+01:00 Gandalf Corvotempesta
:
> I would like to add more ram, but i'm waiting for current backup to
> end from this Friday
Anyway, 2 days ago I had 1 full backup completed. a couple of hours
after, an incremental was started and completed the following day.
Yesterday a
2016-01-11 18:47 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> What about RAM and disk speed?
2GB and standard SATA disks @7200
Tomorrow (if backup will end) i'll add more ram up to 4GB or 8GB
> In any case you might check
> to see if the server side has free RAM and is not swapping to disk.
Actually i'm using 146
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2016-01-11 17:28 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
>> I haven't used v4 but it sounds like you have some issue with your
>> network, rsync, or lack of resources. The main difference between a
>> full and incremental should just be that the
2016-01-11 18:18 GMT+01:00 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom :
> For initial transfers, rsync is notably slower than tar or the like (I don't
> remember how Bacula does it). After the initial transfers tho, it should get
> faster. If you're still seeing this slowness after a couple of transfers,
> there prob
On 01/11 05:58 , Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> I don't have any issue with my network, the same server, with Bacula
> (i'm running Bacula and BackupPC on the same server, obviously one per
> time)
> will backup the same huge client in 16 hours, not 3 days.
>
> Same server, same disks, same networ
2016-01-11 17:28 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> I haven't used v4 but it sounds like you have some issue with your
> network, rsync, or lack of resources. The main difference between a
> full and incremental should just be that the full will do a complete
> read on the client side. The actual data
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Gandalf Corvotempesta
wrote:
> 2016-01-11 15:38 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
>> Also note that with backuppc it is generally better to run fulls more
>> frequently, since unlike other backup programs they don't much
>> additional space. And, unless your timing requir
2016-01-11 15:38 GMT+01:00 Les Mikesell :
> Also note that with backuppc it is generally better to run fulls more
> frequently, since unlike other backup programs they don't much
> additional space. And, unless your timing requirements are extremely
> tight it is better to let the server do the s
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom
wrote:
> On 01/11 09:32 , Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
>> 2016-01-11 3:03 GMT+01:00 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom :
>> > I don't know v4, but in v3 we generally do this with a cron job. Something
>> > like this, which causes a job to go off on Sep
On 01/11 09:32 , Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> 2016-01-11 3:03 GMT+01:00 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom :
> > I don't know v4, but in v3 we generally do this with a cron job. Something
> > like this, which causes a job to go off on September 7th.
> > 00 01 7 9 * backuppc /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_
2016-01-11 3:03 GMT+01:00 Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom :
> I don't know v4, but in v3 we generally do this with a cron job. Something
> like this, which causes a job to go off on September 7th.
> 00 01 7 9 * backuppc /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_serverMesg backup
> host.example.com host.example.com
On 01/09 01:58 , Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote:
> in v4, I would like to schedule a full backup on first Saturday for
> each month, for example, 6th of February, 5th of March, 2nd of April,
> and so on.
> All other days, an incremental should be done.
I don't know v4, but in v3 we generally do this
14 matches
Mail list logo
